Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-27 Thread Manuel Tortosa
El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 22:47:49, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: The situation with KDEBindings is quite compicated atm 4.9 needs a new release of Soprano, else Nepomuk-core does not compile, BUT this make impossible to compile Smokekde as does not compiles with Soprano from GIT an

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 22:39:24, Myriam Schweingruber va escriure: > Hi Albert, > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > >> Hey, > >> > >> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 A

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Allen Winter
On Tuesday 22 May 2012 4:27:54 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > > Hey, > > > > On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote: > > > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE > > > 4.

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 22:27:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > > On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote: > > > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for > > > KDE > > > 4.9. > >

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi Albert, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: >> Hey, >> >> On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote: >> > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 13:07:35, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > Hey, > > On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote: > > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE > > 4.9. > > > > Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at R

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hey, On Sunday, May 20, 2012 13:19:36 Allen Winter wrote: > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE > 4.9. > > Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at Release Central > (tm) > > I propose we reset back to the soft feature freeze mode now. > Th

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On 05/21/2012 11:55 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Diumenge, 20 de maig de 2012, a les 13:19:36, Allen Winter va escriure: I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE 4.9. Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at Release Central (tm) I propose w

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-22 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 21.05.2012 23:59, schrieb Albert Astals Cid: El Diumenge, 20 de maig de 2012, a les 20:10:34, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: So instead of delaying all the freezes, let's just branch KDE/4.9 right now and open up master for feature commits (4.10). This gives the release team the time it needs a

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 20 de maig de 2012, a les 20:10:34, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > Am 20.05.2012 19:19, schrieb Allen Winter: > > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule > > for KDE 4.9. > > > > Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at Release > > Central (t

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 20 de maig de 2012, a les 13:19:36, Allen Winter va escriure: > I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE > 4.9. > > Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at Release Central > (tm) > > I propose we reset back to the soft feature freez

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-20 Thread Mathias Kraus
> So instead of delaying all the freezes, let's just branch KDE/4.9 right > now and open up master for feature commits (4.10). This gives the > release team the time it needs and the developers what they really care > about ;-) +1 from me. This would especially help the GSoC students who work on

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-20 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 20.05.2012 19:19, schrieb Allen Winter: I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE 4.9. Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at Release Central (tm) I propose we reset back to the soft feature freeze mode now. Then start over with the hard fe

Re: Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-20 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On 05/20/2012 07:19 PM, Allen Winter wrote: I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE 4.9. Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at Release Central (tm) I propose we reset back to the soft feature freeze mode now. Then start over with the hard f

Delay KDE 4.9 (Was: KDE 4.9 Beta 1 Tagging)

2012-05-20 Thread Allen Winter
I can't see anyway at all that we can keep to the current schedule for KDE 4.9. Well, not unless we get a lot more activity going here at Release Central (tm) I propose we reset back to the soft feature freeze mode now. Then start over with the hard feature freeze and messate freeze on 17 June. E