Re: Binary packages section of info/release.php pages

2012-11-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 9 de novembre de 2012, a les 10:43:08, Eric Hameleers va escriure: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > On 2012-11-09 23:33, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > >> On Friday, November 09, 2012 00:27:18 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >>> I was looking to

Re: Binary packages section of info/release.php pages

2012-11-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 9 de novembre de 2012, a les 19:55:18, Andrea Scarpino va escriure: > On Friday 09 November 2012 10:43:08 Eric Hameleers wrote: > > I asked Dirk on two occasions how I could add the Slackware packages > > for KDE on that page, but I never revceived an answer. If anyone can > > instru

Re: Binary packages section of info/release.php pages

2012-11-10 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 10 de novembre de 2012, a les 23:58:20, Michael Palimaka va escriure: > On 2012-11-10 11:56, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dissabte, 10 de novembre de 2012, a les 04:30:31, Michael Palimaka va > > > > escriure: > >> I also note that http://www.kde.org

Modules for 4.10 beta 1

2012-11-14 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Please check that everything is in order. SVN modules will be taken from trunk/KDE/$1, except oxygen-icons from trunk/kdesupport/oxygen-icons and kde-l10n from trunk/l10n-kde4 git will be taken from the branch mentioned in the file. Cheers, Albertkdelibs KD

4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-11-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions they were cretead from. ** NEW DEPENDENCIES ** akonadi 1.8.80 http://download.kde.org/stable/akonadi/src/ ** GONE TARBALLS ** - kdegames has been split to mimic g

Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-11-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 16 de novembre de 2012, a les 15:15:13, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location > > I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions > they were cretead from. > > ** NEW DEPENDENC

Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-11-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
ca445 Thanks to Andrea Scarpino for the report and to Christophe Giboudeaux for the quick fix. Cheers, Albert El Divendres, 16 de novembre de 2012, a les 19:24:19, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El Divendres, 16 de novembre de 2012, a les 15:15:13, Albert Astals Cid va > > esc

Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-11-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 16 de novembre de 2012, a les 23:22:39, Andrea Scarpino va escriure: > On Friday 16 November 2012 23:08:19 you wrote: > > On Friday 16 November 2012 20:59:37 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > I've updated the kdepimlibs tarball to include > > > cb96016d

Re: libkdcraw api compatibility?

2012-11-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 18 de novembre de 2012, a les 12:22:16, Andreas K. Huettel va escriure: > Hi, > > it seems like there are api-incompatible changes in libkdcraw-4.9.80 > (compared to 4.9.x). That's fine, we only guarantee api compatibility for kdelibs and kdepimlibs amongst all the 4.x releases. S

Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-11-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 18 de novembre de 2012, a les 20:32:41, John Balcaen va escriure: > 2012/11/16 Albert Astals Cid > > > The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location > > [...] > I noticed that kstars now need indilib 0.9.6 however this version of > indilib is no

Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-11-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 18 de novembre de 2012, a les 22:00:55, John Balcaen va escriure: > 2012/11/16 Albert Astals Cid > > > The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location > > [...] > > While reading my whole rpm's build log i noticed an issue with the > pkgconfi

Re: 4.10 beta1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-11-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 16 de novembre de 2012, a les 23:04:07, Andrea Scarpino va escriure: > Great, > I did build everything. The only issue I have are: > > * kate, pate build fails (KDEBUG#31020) Thanks to Luca Beltrame and Shaheed Haque for the fix/review githash is now a906cc2d3fa0f0666bd065e5ac7f1c

Re: kdegraphicslibs (Was: libkdcraw api compatibility?)

2012-11-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 11:38:09, Allen Winter va escriure: > Sounds like we need a new module for graphics libraries. > Along the lines of kdepimlibs, but for graphics Why? The people developing those libraries don't want to maintain the ABI/API of these libs during all the li

Re: kdegraphicslibs (Was: libkdcraw api compatibility?)

2012-11-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 14:25:22, Allen Winter va escriure: > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 07:33:28 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 11:38:09, Allen Winter va escriure: > > > Sounds like we need a new module for

Re: kdegraphicslibs (Was: libkdcraw api compatibility?)

2012-11-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 20:31:13, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 14:25:22 Allen Winter wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 November 2012 07:33:28 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 11:38:0

The misterious case of oxygen-icons (bis)

2012-11-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Last August I started a discussion about oxygen-icons that didn't really get anywhere http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-August/006364.html The summary is that we release oxygen-icons with all the releases, e.g. 4.9.0, 4.9.1, etc but we always release if from trunk/kdesupport/oxygen

Re: Review Request: aprs: use external QextSerialPort for TTY reading

2012-11-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
- Albert Astals Cid On Nov. 30, 2012, 6:29 p.m., Pino Toscano wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: 4.9.4 tarballs available (for packagers)

2012-12-01 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 1 de desembre de 2012, a les 08:56:57, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > The tarballs can be found in their usual embargo location (available only to > packagers) > > I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions > from which they have been created. There wh

4.10 beta2 tarballs available for packagers

2012-12-01 Thread Albert Astals Cid
The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location (unstable/4.9.90) I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions they were created from. No known changes in dependencies, etc from beta 1. I have built the packages and build fine here Cheers, Albert P.S:

Re: kdesdk migration

2012-12-10 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 10 de desembre de 2012, a les 13:28:45, Jeremy Whiting va escriure: > Hello release team guys, > > In preparing the kdesdk rules for migrating kdesdk from svn to git Neat! > I'm > wondering what the best time would be to migrate. I see 4.10 beta is to be > tagged next week, Your

Re: kde-runtime kdelibs dep

2012-12-14 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 14 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:52:32, David Faure va escriure: > I just fixed a bug in kde-runtime (bug 183403), but I can't commit the last > part of the fix, because it would make kde-runtime depend (at runtime) on > kdelibs >= 4.10. Currently the toplevel cmakelists.txt says 4.8.

Branching KDE/4.10 on Sunday

2012-12-14 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Hi, anyone against branching KDE/4.10 on Sunday? This would be similar to what we did with 4.9, branch before the RC so the RC's are already tagged from the new branches. Cheers, Albert ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.

Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Albert Astals Cid
There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with cmake 2.8.8 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7589 http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-December/006566.html But cmake 2.8.8 is what we are requiring at the global kdelibs level. Should we:

Re: Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 15 de desembre de 2012, a les 15:41:37, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with > > cmake 2.8.8 > > > &

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas va escriure: > Hello, > > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > > > > Alex > > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work. > With the 2.8.9 cmake, the issues is solved, without the attached p

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va escriure: > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis Tsiapaliokas > > va> > > escriure: > >> Hello, > >> > >>> At

Re: [Kde-pim] Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:37:59, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > On Sunday 16 December 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > Attached, can somebody give it a try ? > > > > > > Alex > > > > I have test the attached patch with 2.8.8 cmake and it doesn't work.

4.10 RC1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-12-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location (unstable/4.9.95) I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions they were created from. We have increased the cmake required version from 2.8.8 to 2.8.9 but 2.8.9 was already needed otherwise kdepimlibs didn't

Re: 4.10 RC1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-12-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
r next RC, thanks for the report :-) http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kdepimlibs.git&a=commit&h=c8e1a1b9199fa2398a1d4d44c8dbee0cfb6fd8e3 Cheers, Albert > > Anke > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > The tarballs are in their usual packager-only lo

Re: 4.10 RC1 tarballs available for packagers

2012-12-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 19 de desembre de 2012, a les 15:59:53, Andrea Scarpino va escriure: > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 23:56:36 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I have built the packages and build fine here > > Everything built fine here too, but both kde-base-artwork and kde-workspace

Re: Exception for Dolphin - KFileMetadataWidget

2012-12-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 21 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:27:17, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > Hello release team > > As most of you must know for KDE 4.9, a new package nepmuk-core was > released, and with 4.10 we are now releasing nepomuk-widgets. The > nepomuk-widgets initially just contained the Tagging

Re: Exception for Dolphin - KFileMetadataWidget

2012-12-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 22 de desembre de 2012, a les 10:37:00, Frank Reininghaus va escriure: > Hi everyone, Hi > 2012/12/21 Albert Astals Cid: > > El Divendres, 21 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:27:17, Vishesh Handa va > > > > escriure: > >> Hello release team > >&

Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

2012-12-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 26 de desembre de 2012, a les 17:00:43, Christian Mollekopf va escriure: > Hey, > > I have a set of patches for the akonadi-nepomuk feeder containing massive > performance improvements but also fairly intrusive changes how the feeders > work, as the concept used so far didn't really

Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

2012-12-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:14:51, Christian Mollekopf va escriure: > On Wednesday 26 December 2012 22.28:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimecres, 26 de desembre de 2012, a les 17:00:43, Christian Mollekopf > > va > > > > escriure: > > &g

Re: Application version numbers, SC version numbers and FIXED-IN

2012-12-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:16:55, Allen Winter va escriure: > On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Gwenview version number is 2.x.y, where x.y follows KDE SC 4.x.y (meaning > > KDE SC 4.9.5 ships Gwenview 2.9.5). > > > > Until now we hav

Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

2012-12-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Volker, Vishesh, David, Laurent, can any of you guys comment on the code Christian is asking to be in RC2? Cheers, Albert El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:56:11, Christian Mollekopf va escriure: > On Thursday 27 December 2012 18.44:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dijo

Re: Application version numbers, SC version numbers and FIXED-IN

2012-12-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:27:25, Michael Pyne va escriure: > On Thursday, December 27, 2012 23:42:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:16:55, Allen Winter va escriure: > > > On Thursday 27 December 2012 11:57:28 AM Aur

Re: 4.9.5 tarballs available (for packagers)

2012-12-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 28 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:59:01, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > The tarballs can be found in their usual embargo location (available only to > packagers) > > I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions > from which they have been created. I've

Re: Review Request: ktouch: require at least KDE SC 4.10 RC 1 libaries

2012-12-29 Thread Albert Astals Cid
ll be "impossible" for people using 4.9 i don't think the release-team should have any complaint against that either. - Albert Astals Cid On Dec. 29, 2012, 11:42 a.m., Sebastian Gottfried wrote: > > --- > This is an autom

Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

2012-12-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 30 de desembre de 2012, a les 01:18:06, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > On Friday, December 28, 2012 21:54:17 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Seriously. I know I'm probably just putting my foot in my mouth once more > > here, but: > > > > What are betas and rc's for, if not for stabili

Fwd: Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

2012-12-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
I guess this was for the list, not only me -- Missatge reenviat -- Assumpte: Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements Data: Diumenge, 30 de desembre de 2012, 20:33:09 De: yahoo-pier_andreit On 30/12/12 15:08, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Diumenge, 30

We are having RC3 was: Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

2012-12-31 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 31 de desembre de 2012, a les 16:44:18, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Sunday 30 December 2012 20:55:22 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Monday, December 31, 2012 12:24:18 AM Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 30, 2012 02:41:43 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > > Assuming 4.10

4.10 RC2 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid
The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location (unstable/4.9.97) I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions they were created from. You should also get akonadi 1.9 and soprano 2.9 to go along with this release. I have built the packages and build fine h

Re: 4.10 RC2 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 3 de gener de 2013, a les 20:19:57, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location (unstable/4.9.97) > > I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions > they were created from. > > You shou

Re: 4.10 RC2 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 3 de gener de 2013, a les 21:48:51, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El Dijous, 3 de gener de 2013, a les 20:19:57, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > > The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location (unstable/4.9.97) > > > > I'm attaching the sha1s

Fwd: www/sites/www

2013-01-04 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Any taker for the remaining tasks? Cheers, Albert -- Missatge reenviat -- SVN commit 1330742 by aacid: 4.10 RC2 Someone with more knowledge than me needs to do kde-annou...@kde.org, kde- press-announce and dot.kde.org A announcements/announce-4.10-rc2.php

Re: Kopete changelog

2013-01-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Adding kde-promo and Jos to make sure it's noticed by people writing the release announcement. Cheers, Albert El Divendres, 11 de gener de 2013, a les 08:06:54, Pali Rohár va escriure: > Hello, > > I do not know how is KDE developers adding changelog or future > list to announcement of new KD

Re: Kopete changelog

2013-01-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 11 de gener de 2013, a les 11:31:26, Pali Rohár va escriure: > On Friday 11 January 2013 08:53:04 Urs Wolfer wrote: > > On 2013-01-11 08:06, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I do not know how is KDE developers adding changelog or > > > future > > > list to announcement of n

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-15 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va escriure: > Howdy, > > A proposed KDE SC 4.11 Release schedule is now available at > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule > > (created using toma's really useful releaseschedule program) > > Please review an

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 16 de gener de 2013, a les 14:22:23, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i'd like everyone to comment > > > > 1) Drop Betas to 1 > > >

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 16 de gener de 2013, a les 15:06:05, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > On Wednesday 16 January 2013 14.22.23 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i

Re: kopete and gcc4.7

2013-01-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 16 de gener de 2013, a les 15:08:19, Pali Rohár va escriure: > Hello, > > last kopete in svn cannot be compiled with gcc 4.7 and -O2 due to > some problem with memset (compiler/linker thinks that sometimes > third arg len can be zero). Have a bug for this been reported to the gcc dev

4.10 RC3 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location (unstable/4.9.98) I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions they were created from. There is a new language "mr - Marathi" I have built the packages and build fine here Cheers, Albert2f5eac08181b274aff7

Re: 4.10 RC3 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
lbert > Qt 4.8.4Cups 1.6.1Cmake 2.8.9 > Anke Boersma On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: The tarballs are in their usual packager-only location (unstable/4.9.98) I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions they were created from.

Re: 4.10 RC3 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 17 de gener de 2013, a les 16:57:50, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: > kde-workspace didn't link for me > > fixed in 374024abc92dcd73fa9fd19444803c85ae7c3145 New kde-workspace is up with commit 374024abc92dcd73fa9fd19444803c85ae7c3145 sha1sum of the tarball is e3fca63a2a37e78b5a6505af232

Re: 4.10 RC3 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 17 de gener de 2013, a les 20:08:04, Martin Graesslin va escriure: > On Thursday 17 January 2013 18:41:31 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Besides Jonathan's fix it also contains two other commits because people > > don't respect tagging freezes. > > I woul

Re: 4.10 RC3 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 17 de gener de 2013, a les 20:51:57, Christoph Feck va escriure: > On Thursday 17 January 2013 18:41:31 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Besides Jonathan's fix it also contains two other commits because > > people don't respect tagging freezes. > > Hi, &g

Re: 4.10 RC3 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 17 de gener de 2013, a les 22:47:17, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El Dijous, 17 de gener de 2013, a les 20:51:57, Christoph Feck va escriure: > > On Thursday 17 January 2013 18:41:31 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Besides Jonathan's fix it also contains tw

Changing the default wallpaper? WAS Re: 4.10 RC3 tarballs available for packagers

2013-01-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Artists? Plasma guys? Albert El Dijous, 17 de gener de 2013, a les 21:37:11, Manuel Tortosa Moreno va escriure: > El Dijous, 17 de gener de 2013, a les 21:35:35, vau > > escriure: > > The default wallpaper needs to > > > be changed in runtime: > sorry, kmail sent the mail before i had time to

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 03:13:05, Christian Mollekopf va escriure: > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23.27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va escriure: > > > > I'd like to propose some changes f

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > 4) Don't release if any if the tests are failing in builds.kde.org > > > > If we have tests, they have to work >

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 19:37:52, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimarts, 15 de gener de 2013, a les 16:30:50, Allen Winter va escriure: > > > Howdy, > > > > > > A proposed

RC3 announcement

2013-01-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Can anyone handle http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kde-common/release/RELEASE_PROMOTION?view=markup For RC3? Cheers, Albert P.S: It was supposed to be out officially yesterday ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 19 de gener de 2013, a les 19:06:52, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:19:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07, Martin Gräßlin va > > escriure: > > > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 23:27:53

Re: Python site packages

2013-01-20 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 20 de gener de 2013, a les 00:55:35, Kevin Kofler va escriure: > On Saturday 19 January 2013 at 22:33:19, David Faure wrote: > > Because this breaks "make install" for developers. > > > > (For the recommended case of installing as user rather than as root). > > The default should make

RC3 l10n packages are bad

2013-01-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
My apologies, i did a mistake and packaged RC3 l10n from trunk instead from the stable branches as I should have done. This is probably not that bad since trunk and stable have hopefully not diverged much yet, but if you are seeing something weird l10n related when using RC3 packages it may be

Re: Tools/Scripts migrated to git

2013-01-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 21 de gener de 2013, a les 13:40:21, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > Hi, > > the release teams tools and scripts have moved from svn (/trunk/kde- > common/release, /trunk/playground/utils/releaseschedule) to git > https://projects.kde.org/projects/sysadmin/release-tools > > Suggested wor

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

2013-01-21 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 21 de gener de 2013, a les 20:36:48, Christian Mollekopf va escriure: > On Saturday 19 January 2013 19.06:52 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:19:03 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Divendres, 18 de gener de 2013, a les 18:58:07,

Re: Review Request 108516: Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir.

2013-01-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
hard. So could this as a half-shipit. I'd like Kevin, Luca, Christophe to comment here too, but we can't all get what we want :D - Albert Astals Cid On Jan. 21, 2013, 11 a.m., Michael Jansen wrote: > > --- > This is

Re: Review Request 108516: Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir.

2013-01-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
hard. So could this as a half-shipit. I'd like Kevin, Luca, Christophe to comment here too, but we can't all get what we want :D - Albert Astals Cid On Jan. 21, 2013, 11 a.m., Michael Jansen wrote: > > --- > This is

Re: Review Request 108516: Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir.

2013-01-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
hard. So could this as a half-shipit. I'd like Kevin, Luca, Christophe to comment here too, but we can't all get what we want :D - Albert Astals Cid On Jan. 21, 2013, 11 a.m., Michael Jansen wrote: > > --- > This is

Re: Review Request 108516: Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir.

2013-01-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
hard. So could this as a half-shipit. I'd like Kevin, Luca, Christophe to comment here too, but we can't all get what we want :D - Albert Astals Cid On Jan. 21, 2013, 11 a.m., Michael Jansen wrote: > > --- > This is

Re: Review Request 108516: Do not hardcode site-packages for the python libdir.

2013-01-22 Thread Albert Astals Cid
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108516/ --- (Updated Jan. 22, 2013, 7:28 p.m.) Review request for Build System, Releas

Re: Tools/Scripts migrated to git

2013-01-23 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 21 de gener de 2013, a les 20:05:08, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El Dilluns, 21 de gener de 2013, a les 13:40:21, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > > Hi, > > > > the release teams tools and scripts have moved from svn (/trunk/kde- > > common/relea

[solid] [Bug 313888] Solid::Device( "/org/kde/fuse/run/vmblock-fuse" ).parent() returns same device, causing infinite loops in Amarok

2013-01-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313888 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC|aa...@kde.org |release-team@kde.org -- You are receiving

[solid] [Bug 313888] Solid::Device( "/org/kde/fuse/run/vmblock-fuse" ).parent() returns same device, causing infinite loops in Amarok (ivan/* kdelibs branches)

2013-01-26 Thread Albert Astals Cid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313888 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC|release-team@kde.org| --- Comment #9 from Albert Astals Cid

Re: kopete and gcc4.7

2013-01-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 27 de gener de 2013, a les 18:10:00, Pali Rohár va escriure: > On Saturday 19 January 2013 18:41:38 Tomáš Trnka wrote: > > > El Dimecres, 16 de gener de 2013, a les 15:08:19, Pali Rohár > > va escriure: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > last kopete in svn cannot be compiled with gcc 4.7

Final language list for 4.10

2013-01-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
4.10 release language list ar bg bs ca ca@valencia cs da de el en_GB es et eu fa fi fr ga gl he hi hr hu ia is it ja kk km ko lt lv mr nb nds nl nn pa pl pt pt_BR ro ru si <-- misses 23 translations to reach requirements sk sl sr sv tg th <-- misses 14 translations to reach requirements tr ug uk v

4.10.0 tarballs available (for packagers)

2013-01-30 Thread Albert Astals Cid
The tarballs can be found in their usual embargo location (available only to packagers) I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions from which they have been created. The l10n packages are being generated (hope to get them tomorrow morning). I have *not* compil

Re: 4.10.0 tarballs available (for packagers)

2013-01-31 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 30 de gener de 2013, a les 23:58:51, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > The tarballs can be found in their usual embargo location (available only to > packagers) > > I'm attaching the sha1sum of the tarballs and the branches, hashes/revisions > from which th

Re: 4.10.0 tarballs available (for packagers)

2013-01-31 Thread Albert Astals Cid
kdepim has been respun to include commit 3698a8709f518d88510520df3e9e5e6f2a36995d sha1sum is 6074fcea53b10c3660c5cc9a00b65e777840fdc4 Thanks to the kdepim people for making me have an ultra fast breakfast. Cheers, Albert El Dimecres, 30 de gener de 2013, a les 23:58:51, Albert Astals Cid va

Re: [kde-promo] 4.10 announcement ready for translation

2013-02-04 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Unfortunately you forgot to tell the translators. Cheers, Albert El Divendres, 1 de febrer de 2013, a les 04:03:43, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > Hi, > > The announcement can now be translated, it's in the usual place in the www > svn repo. > > Thanks everybody for the work so far! > > Ch

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-04 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 31 de gener de 2013, a les 22:42:20, Andrea Scarpino va escriure: > LS > > Since there is not a clear answer yet, and both the undersigned Distro's > feel a better way of testing the tagged tars is needed during the 4-5 days > before they are officially released, we'd like to make a pro

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-05 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 4 de febrer de 2013, a les 21:26:31, Andrea Scarpino va escriure: > On Monday 04 February 2013 21:03:48 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Can you provide an easier way to find Dirk's mail, like a webarchive mail > > or at least an approximate date of the email and the

Re: Changing the Nepomuk Tags icon in 4.10.1

2013-02-06 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 6 de febrer de 2013, a les 19:43:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > Hey guys Hi > > I recently rekindled my request to the kde-artists team[1] about a special > tag icon for the nepomuk tags kioslave. Thomas was nice enough to point me > to the "feed-subscribe" icon which looks so muc

www/sites/www/info

2013-02-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
SVN commit 133 by aacid: Add this after talking with Vishesh CCMAIL: release-team@kde.org M +1 -1 4.10.0.php --- trunk/www/sites/www/info/4.10.0.php #1338887:133 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ surfacing after the release was packaged: -None +Fileindexer does not index recursi

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 9 de febrer de 2013, a les 19:19:24, Pierre Schmitz va escriure: > Am 05.02.2013 20:42, schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > > El Dilluns, 4 de febrer de 2013, a les 21:26:31, Andrea Scarpino va escriure: > >> We'd like to know if we can put the packages in a

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-10 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 10 de febrer de 2013, a les 08:15:40, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Saturday 09 February 2013 23:08:50 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Of course another option is lifting the requirement for the pre-packages > > not being publicly available, after all the packages will

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
ct bug report? > > Anke Boersma > abveritas@chakra-project > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > > On Monday 11 February 2013 00.24.51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Diumenge, 10 de febrer de 2013, a les 08:15:40, Martin Gräßlin va > &

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 18:32:32, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 11:57:21 Anke Boersma wrote: > > As to point 2, having a much clearer set policy, that any distro can > > convey > > to their testers must surely result in less badly placed bug reports. > >

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 19:27:49, Ralf Jung va escriure: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > > Now let's assume we would have the packages out in the wild for > > 4.11 prior to release. The version information reported by DrKonqui > > is 4.11.0 - no matte

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 14:37:22, Anke Boersma va escriure: > To get a clear picture then, our early tar builds should be completely > hidden (not possible on our server), even-though no regular user has access > to them, Can you please clarify if your tarballs are public or not?

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 15:28:35, Anke Boersma va escriure: > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta. What was found > and reported often, is regressions from say, 4.x.2 to 4.x.3. Right, regressions are bad, we all have them, but as said, raising the flag 2 days

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 22:05:00, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:28:35 Anke Boersma wrote: > > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta. > > Sorry at least to me that was not obvious. (thread started on 31. of > January, doesn't mention

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 13 de febrer de 2013, a les 01:21:07, Andreas K. Huettel va escriure: > Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013, 22:05:00 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:28:35 Anke Boersma wrote: > > > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta. > > > > Sorry at least t

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
erver, > the repo's are not hidden, you can find any early builds. Ok, my bad, confused Chakra and Arch here. But the fact that you have different package publishing rules confuses me a bit in why the shared email, since obviously I can't see any issue with what you do, but I can

Re: Better testing of tagged tars

2013-02-13 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 13 de febrer de 2013, a les 08:02:16, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Wednesday 13 February 2013 01:00:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 22:05:00, Martin Gräßlin va > > escriure: > > > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:

Re: stepping back from release duties

2013-02-19 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 19 de febrer de 2013, a les 15:38:49, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > On Tuesday 19 February 2013 13.19.37 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > [...] > > > I decided to take a step back > > [...] > > I just wanted to say "Thank you for you work (on releases and on all other > KDE stuff)!". +1 Al

Re: KDE SC 4.10.1 tarballs

2013-03-02 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 1 de març de 2013, a les 20:54:04, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > Hi, > > The tarballs for the 4.10.1 release are now available in the usual location. > > I've not compiled them so please report any issues you find. The kde-workspace package failed to compile here /home/kdepackages/

Re: KDE SC 4.10.1 tarballs

2013-03-03 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Diumenge, 3 de març de 2013, a les 09:47:32, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Sunday 03 March 2013 00:21:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Divendres, 1 de març de 2013, a les 20:54:04, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The tarballs for the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >