1. Isn't it easy to avoid the hate speech by avoiding the calumny of all
Muslims and just report the facts?
2. What defense do you have for such race/religion/ethnic slurs?
3. Truth is what here - that all Muslims do in fact engage in honor killings?
Or that just Muslims do? Or that there
1. Well, recall that Langballe was simply saying "there are
Muslim fathers who rape their daughters when the truth instead seems to be that
they make do with killing daughters (so-called honour killings) -- and moreover
turn a blind eye to rapes by uncles." He seems to think tha
This wasn't an academic study with empirical conclusions.
On Jan 13, 2011, at 7:28 PM, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
> 3. But say that it’s false, and that this behavior isn’t more
> common among Muslims than among others. How can we possibly know that, if
> it’s a crime to challenge this or
so, in short, you have no defense of hate mongering other than we allow it
under our constitution.
On Jan 13, 2011, at 7:28 PM, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
>1. Well, recall that Langballe was simply saying “there are
> Muslim fathers who rape their daughters when the truth instead se
So? First, the law doesn't have an exception for academic
studies with empirical conclusions.
But, second, and more important, the progress of social science
-- and other science -- doesn't consist solely of academic studies. How do
social scientists even figure
Question: How many Danes does it take to change a lightbulb?
Answer: I can't answer that question; it would be a crime.
[Name withheld to prevent extradition]
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change opt
