Religion issues for Law Academics (religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu)
Subject: Closely-held corporations, owners of corporations, and RFRAs
Why would doctrines of corporate law bar a closely held
corporation's owners from asserting that a regulation of the corporation
substantially
Academics (religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu)
*Subject:* Closely-held corporations, owners of corporations, and RFRAs***
*
** **
Why would doctrines of corporate law bar a closely held
corporation’s owners from asserting that a regulation of the corporation
substantially burden
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 6:58 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Closely-held corporations, owners of corporations, and RFRAs
Actually, in order to make the hypothetical
:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marty Lederman
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 06, 2013 6:58 AM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Closely-held corporations, owners of corporations, and
RFRAs
** **
Actually, in order to make the hypothetical analogous
for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Closely-held corporations, owners of corporations, and RFRAs
The distinctions offered in the first two paragraphs below
might well represent a sensible moral judgment. But I don’t see how it can
affect the RFRA substantial burden analysis
