Thanks for the explanation. I'm wondering what the argument would be to
make property
tax exemption constitutionally required. There is a growing movement
against such tax
breaks, which is supported by the economic situation of many local
governments, so I
would expect there will be an
is immortal Dr. Balthasar Hubmaier, 1527
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of James Edward Maule
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 8:24 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Driveway Fee as Tax on Churches
One of my
Thanks for the update.
Jim Maule
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Erik Stanley
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:14 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Driveway Fee as Tax on Churches
I litigated
Erik-- Just so I understand the principle here. The city should have
provided an exemption because the
state law grants all religious organizations a property tax exemption? Or
are you saying that
the exemption was constitutionally required?
Thanks---
Marci A. Hamilton
Paul R. Verkuil
: Driveway Fee as Tax on Churches
Erik-- Just so I understand the principle here. The city should have provided
an exemption because the
state law grants all religious organizations a property tax exemption? Or are
you saying that
the exemption was constitutionally required?
Thanks
One of my readers sent this link to me. The article describes the use of a
driveway fee (measured by estimated number of vehicle transits) to get around
state property tax exemptions for churches. Apparently the instance described
is not the first time this has been tried. This is new to me.