RE: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-16 Thread Douglas Laycock
Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question On a quick read, it appears that neither of the state assisted suicide statutes is analogous, either. They merely confirm that although entities can assist suicides, no one is under any

Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-16 Thread Marty Lederman
...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marty Lederman *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 2:02 PM *To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics *Subject:* Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question On a quick read, it appears that neither

RE: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-16 Thread Douglas Laycock
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 3:15 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question I think I'm all apples, Doug. In cases where the government has decided

Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-16 Thread Marty Lederman
-8546 *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marty Lederman *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 3:15 PM *To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics *Subject:* Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-16 Thread Douglas Laycock
Academics Subject: Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question For what it's worth, I have never endorsed the argument that corporations, for-profit or otherwise, cannot exercise religion and are thus categorically outside the aegis of RFRA. To the contrary, conscience

Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-16 Thread Marty Lederman
...@lists.ucla.edureligionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Marty Lederman *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 3:52 PM *To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics *Subject:* Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question For what it's worth, I have never endorsed

Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-16 Thread Christopher Lund
Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question   For what it's worth, I have never endorsed the argument that corporations, for-profit or otherwise, cannot exercise religion and are thus categorically outside the aegis of RFRA

Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood briefs -- and an historical question

2014-02-11 Thread Marty Lederman
Hobby Lobby brief: http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/13-354-bs-1-copy.pdf Government brief in Conestoga Wood: http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/13-356bsUnitedStates-copy.pdf I have a question for the members of the listserv: The main point of the