She stated that she has ordered that the licenses issued by the Deputies
will not include her name *or title or "authority" *[not clear what that
means, since the form doesn't mention her "authority" in the first place],
and that the licenses will bear the notation "Issued pursuant to a federal
summarizing:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/09/kim-davis-developments.html
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Marty Lederman
wrote:
> She stated that she has ordered that the licenses issued by the Deputies
> will not include her name *or title or "authority" *[not
Update:
Unlike the licenses previously issued by deputy clerk Brian Mason to
same-sex couples, which included "in the office of Rowan County," the
license he issued this morning has the words "in the office of" crossed out
and the language "Pursuant to the Federal Court Order" in the place where
The license for the first couple (nonplaintiffs Carmen and Shannon
Wampler-Collins) reads:
"*Issued this 9/14/2015* [crossed out: "in the office of , ___
(blanks for "name" and "county")"] *Pursuant to Federal Court Order No.
15-CY-44, DLB,* [crossed out: "County Clerk"]* Morehead,
Sorry -- "deposition" in the message below should be "preliminary
injunction hearing." - Jim
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:14 AM, James Oleske wrote:
> Update:
>
> Unlike the licenses previously issued by deputy clerk Brian Mason to
> same-sex couples, which included "in the
lawp...@lists.ucla.edu; Michael Dorf; Samuel Bagenstos
Subject: Re: Kim Davis announcement about what she'll do at work today
Update:
Unlike the licenses previously issued by deputy clerk Brian Mason to same-sex
couples, which included "in the office of Rowan County," the lic