think?
Chris
From: Christopher C. Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:36:18 -0600
Yes, to the extent that this lawsuit is about using
I want to get everyone's thoughts on the appeals court case against
South Orange-Maplewood School District in New Jersey. The school has a
policy not to have religious music performed by the choir or band and
that policy is being challenged as unconstitutional. Now, I think the
policy is a bad
I haven't seen the suit (does anyone have a copy?), but I could guess
the theory is either that 1) the policy infringes free exercise of
students and/or teachers, with a supporting argument that the music at
issue is not being officially sponsored by the school, or 2) it's a
Rosenberger-type
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Brayton
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 12:22 PM
To: Religionlaw list
Subject: New Jersey Lawsuit
I want to get everyone's thoughts on the appeals court case against
South Orange-Maplewood School District
taught religious
truths as truths?
Chip Lupu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Brayton
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 12:22 PM To: Religionlaw list Subject:
New Jersey Lawsuit
I want to get everyone's thoughts on the appeals
sensitivities justification...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lupu
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 2:21 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
On 16 Dec 2005 at 13:56, Bezanson, Randall P wrote:
Welcome
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
On 16 Dec 2005 at 13:56, Bezanson, Randall P wrote:
Welcome to the new First Amendment. Under the Court's decisions
religious music is not constitutionally compelled to be played, but
it
is unconstitutional to exclude it if it otherwise meets
: Friday, December 16, 2005 10:45 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: New Jersey Lawsuit
I haven't seen the suit (does anyone have a copy?), but I could guess
the theory is either that 1) the policy infringes free exercise of
students and/or teachers, with a supporting argument
On Behalf Of Volokh, EugeneSent: Friday, December 16, 2005 4:05 PMTo:
Law Religion issues for Law AcademicsSubject: RE: New Jersey
Lawsuit Wouldn't the school
have a sort of editorial right over the content of its band performances, a la
Hazelwood, even if it often defers to student
preferen
Academics
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:04:32 -0800
Wouldn't the school have a sort of editorial right over the
content of its band performances, a la Hazelwood, even
in a world where up is down and out is in and wrong is
right. Larry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bezanson,
Randall P
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 3:10 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
It comes
11 matches
Mail list logo
