RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-21 Thread Marc Stern
cla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 05:14 To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: No religious advertisements on municipal buses Perhaps Lehman is not such good law anymore -- only a plurality opinion, and it says the buses are not a public foru

Re: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Ira Lupu
>>> > 324 Law Building >>> > 1 East Campus Drive >>> > Baton Rouge LA 70803 >>> > tel: 225/578-8327 >>> > fax: 225/578-3677 >>> > home page: http://faculty.law.lsu.edu/ccorcos >>> > Feminist Law Professors (ht

Re: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Marty Lederman
f >> religious speech from such locations. >> >> Alan >> >> -Original Message- >> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto: >> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter >> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:13

Re: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Ira Lupu
t; religious speech from such locations. > > Alan > > -Original Message- > From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto: > religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:13 PM > To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.ed

RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Brownstein, Alan
ssage- From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Masinter Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 12:13 PM To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses The problematic case is Lehman v. City of Shake

Re: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Ira Lupu
il: christine.cor...@law.lsu.edu > > -Original Message- > From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto: > religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:35 PM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subjec

RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Michael Masinter
ionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Brownstein, Alan Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 1:35 PM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't recall al

Re: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Douglas Laycock
I assume Fort Worth was relying on Lehman v. Shaker Heights (1974), which held that a bus system can accept commercial advertising and exclude all political advertising. Lehman assumed that a commercial/political line did not involve viewpoint discrimination. Alan is of course right that Rosenb

RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Corcos, Christine
on issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't recall all the details) reporting that a city prohibited all religious advertising on buses because people were annoyed with advertiseme

RE: No religious advertisements on municipal buses

2010-12-20 Thread Brownstein, Alan
I saw a newspaper story a few days ago (I'm sorry, but I don't recall all the details) reporting that a city prohibited all religious advertising on buses because people were annoyed with advertisements expressing a message by Atheists suggesting that there is no G-d. Wouldn't that regulation c