think?
Chris
From: Christopher C. Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:36:18 -0600
Yes, to the extent that this lawsuit is about using
I haven't seen the suit (does anyone have a copy?), but I could guess
the theory is either that 1) the policy infringes free exercise of
students and/or teachers, with a supporting argument that the music at
issue is not being officially sponsored by the school, or 2) it's a
Rosenberger-type
Welcome to the new First Amendment. Under the Court's decisions
religious music is not constitutionally compelled to be played, but it
is unconstitutional to exclude it if it otherwise meets the general and
secular criteria by which the music for the pereformance was selected.
R. Bezanson
On 16 Dec 2005 at 13:56, Bezanson, Randall P wrote:
Welcome to the new First Amendment. Under the Court's decisions
religious music is not constitutionally compelled to be played, but it
is unconstitutional to exclude it if it otherwise meets the general
and secular criteria by which the
sensitivities justification...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lupu
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 2:21 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
On 16 Dec 2005 at 13:56, Bezanson, Randall P wrote:
Welcome
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
On 16 Dec 2005 at 13:56, Bezanson, Randall P wrote:
Welcome to the new First Amendment. Under the Court's decisions
religious music is not constitutionally compelled to be played, but
it
is unconstitutional to exclude it if it otherwise meets
: Friday, December 16, 2005 10:45 AM
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: New Jersey Lawsuit
I haven't seen the suit (does anyone have a copy?), but I could guess
the theory is either that 1) the policy infringes free exercise of
students and/or teachers, with a supporting argument
On Behalf Of Volokh, EugeneSent: Friday, December 16, 2005 4:05 PMTo:
Law Religion issues for Law AcademicsSubject: RE: New Jersey
Lawsuit Wouldn't the school
have a sort of editorial right over the content of its band performances, a la
Hazelwood, even if it often defers to student
preferen
Academics
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:04:32 -0800
Wouldn't the school have a sort of editorial right over the
content of its band performances, a la Hazelwood, even
in a world where up is down and out is in and wrong is
right. Larry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bezanson,
Randall P
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 3:10 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: New Jersey Lawsuit
It comes
10 matches
Mail list logo
