g something here, but
I'm not sure what it is.
Alan
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
on behalf of Marty Lederman [lederman.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 3:19 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for La
Thanks for that extremely thoughtful response, Alan.
I think you're onto something important: I imagine that even if the S&P
report is correct, and many employers will drop their health care plans in
the coming years, there is a definite "first mover" phenomenon at work --
that is to say, the mai
One issue underlying Marty's very effectively presented argument about the
absence of an employer mandate is what counts as the kind of substantial burden
that warrants legal attention. Marty suggests that plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby
need specific allegations and ultimately some direct proof to de
