At 09:32 PM 03/25/07, you wrote:
Since I'm into some self abuse... I'll tell you I've played with
a number of the Repco tx and rx strips you see on ebay every so
often. You can see a VHF tx strip on ebay pretty constant.. the
seller must have a pretty large batch of them. I've also bought
my share
THE moderators(s) were hoping that the (class) would just get over it.
Everyone that responds, including you Dave, is adding to SPAM.
Move on
Kevin Custer
OWNER
DaveH wrote:
What is this English class? It says Repeater builder! Where is the
mderator?
Great to see someone describe the Pulsar well. They came into
the SF Motorola Service Station well through the 80's. I don't
remember ever having to really repair one other than small stupid
user things and some control reprogramming.
Built like a fort with a pretty neat internal duplexer
Darn it Kevin,
... and I was getting ready to use the word irregardless.
Re: IWCE
Once again a quick blurb about the Las Vegas located IWCE (two-way
radio) Convention.
Drop me an email direct (very quick like) If you need free tickets
to save the $60 each entry fee... which you could
I don't remember if it was the Pulsar 120 or not but I did indeed
build a repeater in the late 70's, based on a Pulsar. One channel
element (square copper as I remember) and a 5 mHz 1st IF made it a
piece of cake. It worked surprisingly well for what it was. As this
was in SoCal where UHF
Dwaye,
I would like the S1056A with the interface cable. Let me know how you want to
do it. Tnx
Jim- WA9FPT
- Original Message -
From: ldgelectronics
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:11 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola test set
At 3/26/2007 09:30 AM, you wrote:
Re: IWCE
Once again a quick blurb about the Las Vegas located IWCE (two-way
radio) Convention.
Drop me an email direct (very quick like) If you need free tickets
to save the $60 each entry fee... which you could spend on junk food.
FWIW Roger Coude VE2DBE,
At 3/24/2007 02:57 PM, you wrote:
Reasons not to solder PowerPoles:
1) It is very hard to control the wicking of solder into a stranded
wire. Allowing this to happen can create a failure point in
applications where vibration is present. And there can be a
surprising amount of vibration in a
Wow, that was fast.
They are both spoken for. Thanks,
Dwayne Kincaid
Hi,
I've got a couple of the older Motorola test sets that need to find a
good home. These are S1056A. One has the interface cable and one has
the crystal set strip.
They go for about $10 on e-bay, so it's not
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll bet they are VERY large and have POOR receiver sensitivity
(like .8 uV).
-
Sorry, but you've got your head stuck in the 60's. Those old
as far as range goes.. take the square root of the distance from the
ground to the base of your antenna and multiply it by 1.5 and that would be
your range higher mo betterallen
** AOL now offers free email to everyone.
Find
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, chuckmf1135 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I received a 4 bay (folded j pole or dipole) it has 34 folded
elements
and total boom length around 20'. I wangt to use this for amateur
radio
use, however no one knows what freq their business was on.
I havent
On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as far as range goes.. take the square root of the distance from the
ground to the base of your antenna and multiply it by 1.5 and that would be
your range higher mo betterallen
In what units, Allen? Didn't
That sounds about right to me Nate. I have a repeater with a low
antenna (abt 65 ft) in the flatland around the Dallas area that does
about 12 miles, so not a bad rule of thumb for that low antenna. But I
also have a repeater with an antenna at about 300 ft in that area that
does a lot better
Riley,
I remember seeing a pulsar mod on the web, it might have been this one:
http://www.phreak.org/radio/mods/pulsar.txt
Have a couple of pulsars sitting here I haven't had time to mess with. Was
planning on digging out the duplexers in them. Anyone know how they fair on
the spec anal test
There is a lot more that comes into consideration than height when you begin to
predict the range and/or coverage. I would suggest that anybody wanting to make
predictions of coverage obtain a copy of GE's DF-10003-1 VHF and UHF
Propagation. There are a lot of graphs, but It will help you get
The characteristic impedance of a folded dipole is 300 ohms.
Depends on who you ask really. The impedance of what most people
call a classic folded dipole is about 300 ohms. But measure the
various dipoles by Decibel and Sinclair you'll probably find they
are not all standard size
At 04:59 PM 03/26/07, you wrote:
There is a lot more that comes into consideration than height when
you begin to predict the range and/or coverage. I would suggest that
anybody wanting to make predictions of coverage obtain a copy of
GE's DF-10003-1 VHF and UHF Propagation. There are a lot of
If it was a copper colored square channel element, then the radio should
have been about 2ft long, 6high, and 15 wide and weighed enough to
eliminate the need for the extra couple of sandbags in the trunk in the
winter. TLD-1100 comes to mind but that was the VHF version. Based on a
Motrac,
My first job in the business was as a service tech for an RCC. We had a GE
IMTS terminal with hand wired 5th Selector Level stroger switches on the
direct inward dial trunks complete with sleeve lead control. There were 4
selector switches, and one block on 1000 numbers. In addition to the GE
20 matches
Mail list logo
