Well, in the source address (in the header) is
Dave E Stephens Sr
and he's been a group member since april
of 2008.
I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt
and not ban him, but in case someone's hacked
his password he's now on moderation,
BTW, I know you folks (now over 4800 as of
yester
Who knows? When I see someone spamming a bunch of Yahoo groups, it can't be
good, and I definitely won't click on a link in the message.
Richard, N7TGB
www.n7tgb.net
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's
money
--Margaret Thatcher
_
From: Repe
Virus?
John Hymes
La Rue Communications
10 S. Aurora Street
Stockton, CA 95202
http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
- Original Message -
From: Dave E Stephens Sr
To: montanaaustin...@yahoo.com ; kg6...@yahoo.com ; natest...@gmail.com ;
ps...@yahoogroups.com ; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.co
http://sites.google.com/site/bhzdgorxkb/84d0ujay4o
Yesbut really NO. The sender will decode but the "pick-up" time is rather
slow, causing missed first words, etc.
I had these experiences with several MSR2000's that the factory shipped with
the reeds reversed! A 'sponder will work as a sender because once it is plugged
in, it runs continuous
> Aristotle Zoulas wrote:
> Well, I go by the Repeater Builder Web site that states
> not to use emulators and various other methods to imitate
> a slow computer. Exact Quote below:
Why slow the computer down?
> I picked up a fully working Compaq Laptop on ebay for $20,
> works great for
Late Mitrek boards still SPECIFIED different reeds, but I agree
that they seemed interchangeable. In every case I saw no difference
between TLN6824s, KLN6209s and KLN6210s. Just as a test I removed
the reed hold down post on a Mitrek board and plugged in a TLN8381 fat
decode reed into the decode
> The grungy audio isn't related to the amp.
Yes, I know, you said that. My question was whether the grunge was there
whether or not the repeater transmitter was keyed.
> The TKR may be turned down to 20-30 watts and not trip the
> amp.
By "not trip", do you mean "not key" or "not cause the a
I have good news and bad news
Good news. Found my manual for the HP 3551.
Bad news. The manual is at least several hundred pages with
about 30 very long 17" + pages of schematics.
Ralph
- Original Message -
From: "Ralph S. Turk"
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday,
Does anyone know the frequency response of a TLN4704A
Thanks
Roger
Well, I go by the Repeater Builder Web site that states not to use emulators
and
various other methods to imitate a slow computer. Exact Quote below: I picked
up
a fully working Compaq Laptop on ebay for $20, works great for dos programs.
A low end computer running MS-DOS (486 DX50 - i.e. maxi
Yes it has been swept. (not by me, by someone who knows the commercial
repeater business) Nothing found. But remember this is an intermittant thing.
In a message dated 8/10/2010 9:50:44 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
petedcur...@gmail.com writes:
Have you swept the Antenna and Transmis
Fantastic Tim!
Thanks for that - I will give it a shot and see how that works out. Will let
you know.
Cheers!
John Hymes
La Rue Communications
10 S. Aurora Street
Stockton, CA 95202
http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
- Original Message -
From: Tim Sawyer
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroup
Have you swept the Antenna and Transmission Line with a Site analyzer or a
Comms Analyzer / RF Bridge?
Peter
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:35 AM, wrote:
>
>
> I don't think there are any drain plugs on this antenna. connection seals
> were checked and re-done. I am not familiar with the desense te
I don't think there are any drain plugs on this antenna. connection seals
were checked and re-done. I am not familiar with the desense tests, but
both repeater and duplexer were replaced. New duplexer tested at more than 100
db isolation and power is about 75 watts .Problem must be with hard
Sorry, maybe. It's heavily application dependent. While senders
*tend* to be higher level lower loss devices, that difference diminished
over time. On some newer devices it seemed like the only difference was
the label. The very alst applicaitons before Motorola caved adn went
all electronic u
Sorry, NO. A sender will not work as a sponder.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Lemmon
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 9:13 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Can a KLN 6210A vibrasender be substituted
for a KLN 6209A vibrasponder?
17 matches
Mail list logo
