is legal. Again it is the issue of
IDing without usage that is the problem.
73, ron, n9ee/r
From: Bruce Bagwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/08 Tue PM 01:05:30 CDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's
Every repeater in my area
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's
Every repeater in my area ID's on the hour. Sounds to me like it is either
the freq. (rate) of the ID, (Say every 15 Min.) or the reference to the
website (More likely) that the FCC is having problems
Every repeater in my area ID's on the hour. Sounds to me like it is either the
freq. (rate) of the ID, (Say every 15 Min.) or the reference to the website
(More likely) that the FCC is having problems with. But MAINLY this station
seems to be interfering with another station on A nearby freq.
Can anyone point me to the specific enforcement case or warning letter where
the FCC first said that regular, periodic repeater ID's irrespective of
repeater usage were broadcasting and had to stop? The FCC's online archives
don't seem to go back far enough (seems to me it was in the 80's),
I can't give you a case, but the reason is because it would be a beacon
which is not allowed on the repeater bands. (although many repeaters do
that)
Joe M.
George Henry wrote:
Can anyone point me to the specific enforcement case or warning letter where
the FCC first said that regular,
At 1/19/2008 10:47, you wrote:
Can anyone point me to the specific enforcement case or warning letter where
the FCC first said that regular, periodic repeater ID's irrespective of
repeater usage were broadcasting and had to stop? The FCC's online archives
I received such a warning letter back
Well, that at least confirms the time frame I thought it was in one
step closer, anyway.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Amateur repeater ID's
At 1/19
7 matches
Mail list logo
