RE: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-14 Thread Nate Duehr
> Sounds like a good plan to me... although you would have to pay attention > to keep phone folks from "stepping on" digital folks.. I bet you get > some > odd sounding doubles.. > mike Oh, I believe they're locking out the analog receiver in digital operation. If the digital transmitter drop

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-13 Thread Mike Perryman
Duehr Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:39 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals > In the unlikely event that a repeater designed for FM voice does pass the > digital data well enough to permit a conversation, it will make all the > regu

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-13 Thread Nate Duehr
> In the unlikely event that a repeater designed for FM voice does pass the > digital data well enough to permit a conversation, it will make all the > regular analog FM voice users of the repeater very unhappy. It will sound > like their squelch is wide open, but advancing the squelch control wil

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-13 Thread Jim B.
Nate Duehr wrote: >>It is identified in voice. Just say your call sign just as you would in >>any other mode. >> >>It's looked on as a regular voice mode, just digital modulation instead >>of FM, AM, etc. > > > General notes about digital modulation: > > Of course, there's another thing to consi

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-12 Thread Gary Pearce KN4AQ
>KA9QJG wrote: > > I had a Ham Friend ask Me if My Repeater would Pass the Alnico DJ-596 > EJ-43 > DIGITAL Signal... > > Thanks Don KA9QJG At 11:50 AM 12/12/2005, Jim Barbour WD8CHL wrote: >You'll need to have frequency response through the repeater down to near >DC, as digital is basically an

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-12 Thread Nate Duehr
> It is identified in voice. Just say your call sign just as you would in > any other mode. > > It's looked on as a regular voice mode, just digital modulation instead > of FM, AM, etc. General notes about digital modulation: Of course, there's another thing to consider... "Codes and Ciphers" a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-12 Thread Jim B.
larry wrote: > I do have a questionIf the repeater is a traditional fm voice repeater. > wouldn't the digital signal have to be id'ed in either cw or voice > just asking... > Larry ve3fxq It is identified in voice. Just say your call sign just as you would in any other mode. It's looked

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-12 Thread larry
2005 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals > KA9QJG wrote: > > > I had a Ham Friend ask Me if My Repeater would Pass the Alnico DJ-596 EJ-43 > > DIGITAL Signal So He could use that mode to Talk to a Friend with the Same > > Radio , Well I did not h

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-12 Thread Jim B.
KA9QJG wrote: > I had a Ham Friend ask Me if My Repeater would Pass the Alnico DJ-596 EJ-43 > DIGITAL Signal So He could use that mode to Talk to a Friend with the Same > Radio , Well I did not have an answer for Him , But I thought that Digital > Sounded like White noise . And that All Ham sig

[Repeater-Builder] Digital Signals

2005-12-10 Thread KA9QJG
I had a Ham Friend ask Me if My Repeater would Pass the Alnico DJ-596 EJ-43 DIGITAL Signal So He could use that mode to Talk to a Friend with the Same Radio , Well I did not have an answer for Him , But I thought that Digital Sounded like White noise . And that All Ham signals had to be in Clea