RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread Paul Plack
ssage- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 7:53 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's I was in a group that operated a 426 MHz ATV repeater (transm

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread rwhitetexas
AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's Yes, of course your right Rick, but.there are always those that just 'have to' let all of us know what they think or know, because they are the ones that are right. Jim-WA9FPT - O

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread Jim McLaughlin
nt: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's I thought the Moderator closed this tread? No? Rick Klinge KC5UIW

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread Rick Klinge
I thought the Moderator closed this tread? No? Rick Klinge KC5UIW

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread Jim Brown
We added an extension to this system in Greenville, Tx (about 50 miles NE of Dallas) located on the roof of the local hospital. We had an input on 426 with a beam for the Dallas feed and on 43x? to allow local crossband repeat to the 900 mHz band. We later installed a 1296 input when a radar w

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread rwhitetexas
ES training nets. We never heard of anyone mentioning that the system was indeed in the broadcasting mode for over a decade. Roger W5RD Original Message - From: "Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:33 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread Wayne
44 AM > To: repeater builders > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur Repeater ID's > > > > First let's agree on one thing, amateur repeaters are amateur stations. > Second, let's admit that the rules prohibit amateur stations from > one-way transmissions, e

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur repeater ID's

2008-04-11 Thread tallinson2
<> I wonder if someone tripped the breaker or if it's just getting tired? If it trips again, it's probably time to replace it. Hope it isn't a long trip out to the site. Tom --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, TGundo 2003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > MCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Amateur repeater ID's

2008-01-19 Thread Tony L.
The most recent case posted on the FCC's Amateur Radio enforcement actions web site is this one: http://www.fcc.gov/eb/AmateurActions/files/BEDNA07_05_25_1078.pdf --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "George Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anyone point me to the specific enforceme