gt; -- Original Message --
> Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:02:15 PM PDT
> From: "skipp025"
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
>
> >
> > > "JOHN MACKEY" wrote:
> > > Then why not
he first being a true audio derived
Kerchunk Filter.
s.
> -- Original Message --
> Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:02:15 PM PDT
> From: "skipp025"
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
>
> >
> > > "
om
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
>
> > "JOHN MACKEY" wrote:
> > Then why not do all that using the COS provided?
>
> What if there is no provided COS..? Just an audio
> source...
>
> s.
>
> > -- Original Message --
> &g
)?
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:49:01 PM PDT
From: "skipp025"
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
SNIP
> > Helping my echolink node not get confused about
> > what it is supposed to listen to is my primary purp
ater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
>
> >
> >
> > Step right up... welcome to the show... Can any of you
> > tell it's a Friday?
> >
> > > "JOHN MACKEY" wrote:
> > > WHY would someone be us
09:23 PM PDT
From: "Paul Plack"
To:
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
> John, I experimented with that once, and in some situations, it's the most
elegant way to derive a COS-like logic signal from an audio stream that
doesn't carry imbedded switching i
Then why not do all that using the COS provided?
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:53:51 PM PDT
From: "skipp025"
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
>
>
> Step right up... welcome to the show... Can
equency, it can actually act more quickly than
a PLL CTCSS decoder, especially on the lower tones.
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: JOHN MACKEY
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
e COS/COR/PTT logic. The first
portion of the inbound audio is not chopped off.
s.
> -- Original Message --
> Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:49:01 PM PDT
> From: "skipp025"
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
>
WHY would someone be using VOX in a system linked to a repeater (such
as Echolink)?
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:49:01 PM PDT
From: "skipp025"
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Delay
SNIP
> > Helping my e
My main machine has one of the new Arcom 3-port delay modules. I
wasn't overly impressed with the previous Arcom one, but the new one
is a really nice board.
On Oct 23, 2009, at 2:48 PM, skipp025 wrote:
> Cort Buffington wrote:
> Let's not forget that eliminating a noise crash isn't
> th
> Cort Buffington wrote:
> Let's not forget that eliminating a noise crash isn't
> the only reason for an audio delay.
another Amen from the crowd...
> Helping my echolink node not get confused about
> what it is supposed to listen to is my primary purpose
> for having the delay.
Audio
12 matches
Mail list logo