[Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-07 Thread skipp025
[paste] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I will readily admit that available PM exciters > can have all sorts of shortcomings. They distort > when you ask for a lot of deviation at very low > frequencies like CTCSS. There are inherent > nonlinearities in the varactor tank circuit > that create a little

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-08 Thread wd8chl
> Hi Skipp, > > > And we've seen some sloppy engineering in the > > design of the audio and limiter circuits. > > What you're saying here Bob... is that you've > owned at least one Icom IC-230 at some time in > the past. > > :-) > Wow-there's one I haven't heard in a long time-I had one

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-07 Thread scomind
Hi Skipp,   > And we've seen some sloppy engineering in the > design of the audio and limiter circuits.What you're saying here Bob... is that you've owned at least one Icom IC-230 at some time in the past.  :-)   While the mobiles probably suffer from the same kind of engineering shortcuts, I

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-09 Thread Neil McKie
Or a 80D or 140D ... Neil wd8chl wrote: > > > Hi Skipp, > > > > > And we've seen some sloppy engineering in the > > > design of the audio and limiter circuits. > > > > What you're saying here Bob... is that you've > > owned at least one Icom IC-230 at some time in > > the past. > > > > :-