Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Digital repeater allocations, was "Service Monitors with D-Star"

2007-04-24 Thread Jim B.
Nate Duehr wrote: > Not trying to be a spoil-sport, but since Mototrbo isn't a "documented > public protocol" doesn't it fall under the "encrypted" transmission > rules, and wouldn't be allowed in the Amateur bands? No, because any Mototrbo radio can talk to any other Mototrbo radio set for the

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Digital repeater allocations, was "Service Monitors with D-Star"

2007-04-23 Thread Nate Duehr
On 4/23/07, Paul Metzger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mototrbo also allows one to configure the repeater to be either > analog, or digital. But once configured for one (analog or digital), > programming will be required to switch it. > > I have overcome this by placing two repeaters within the sam

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Digital repeater allocations, was "Service Monitors with D-Star"

2007-04-23 Thread Paul Metzger
On Apr 23, 2007, at 21:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 4/23/2007 18:40, you wrote: >>>Re: Service Monitors with D-Star >>>Posted by: "Nate Duehr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wy0x >>>Date: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:24 pm ((PDT)) >>> >>> On 4/23/07, Shanon Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Digital repeater allocations, was "Service Monitors with D-Star"

2007-04-23 Thread no6b
At 4/23/2007 18:40, you wrote: > >Re: Service Monitors with D-Star > >Posted by: "Nate Duehr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wy0x > >Date: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:24 pm ((PDT)) > > > > On 4/23/07, Shanon Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> There are several Death Star repeaters popping up

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Digital repeater allocations, was "Service Monitors with D-Star"

2007-04-23 Thread Al Wolfe
>Re: Service Monitors with D-Star >Posted by: "Nate Duehr" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wy0x >Date: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:24 pm ((PDT)) > > On 4/23/07, Shanon Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> There are several Death Star repeaters popping up in Michigan. The P25 >> repeaters have been ar