: [Repeater-Builder] Re: PA question
Exactly !
All that effort of just 4.5 dB
73,
Neil
mch wrote:
Less than 4.5 dB.
Joe M.
Neil McKie wrote:
What is the real difference between 40 and 110 watts in terms of
dB? Not very
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: PA question
Exactly !
All that effort of just 4.5 dB
73,
Neil
mch wrote:
Less than 4.5 dB.
Joe M.
Neil McKie wrote
It would make more sense to bypass driver stages
in the amplifier, or find another amplifier. For
many rb cases... 40 watts is more than enough. 110
watts out is more trouble than its work, especially
an in/same band remote base.
cheers,
skipp
www.radiowrench.com/sonic
kbednar99 [EMAIL
At 03:43 PM 7/14/2004 -, you wrote:
For many rb cases... 40 watts is more than enough. 110
watts out is more trouble than its work, especially
an in/same band remote base.
---This is what I was thinking too. All that for an additional 4 or 5 Db
seems like a waste to me.
I currently run
to allfor their
replies!
Kevin
K2KMB
-Original Message-
From: Neil McKie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:19 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: PA question
What is the real difference between 40 and 110 watts in terms of dB
: [Repeater-Builder] Re: PA question
Exactly !
All that effort of just 4.5 dB
73,
Neil
mch wrote:
Less than 4.5 dB.
Joe M.
Neil McKie wrote:
What is the real difference between 40 and 110 watts in terms of
dB? Not very much.
Yahoo! Groups Links
PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: PA question
But we make such a big deal out of having a 7.5 DB antenna rather than a
3.5
DB antenna, and that's only 4.5 DB... :-)
73,
Chris, KG0BP
Yahoo! Groups
7 matches
Mail list logo
