Re: CORRECTION Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-10 Thread MCH
Well, I *was* addressing your comment of "Also just to be accurate, there aren't "many" ways they can be configured, only two", and not how many "correct ways" there were based on the ARES/RACES standard. If you go by how many "correct ways" there are to configure them per that standard, the ans

Re: CORRECTION Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-10 Thread Nate Duehr
MCH wrote: > I have to correct something I said. I forgot that while the PPs are > genderless as far as the connectors go, the KEYWAYS are not, so half of > the 16 configurations will not mate. > > As such, there are only 8 configurations that will mate. > See the attached pic. > Number 1 is the

CORRECTION Re: [Repeater-Builder] (anderson power poles revisited)

2009-05-09 Thread MCH
I have to correct something I said. I forgot that while the PPs are genderless as far as the connectors go, the KEYWAYS are not, so half of the 16 configurations will not mate. As such, there are only 8 configurations that will mate. See the attached pic. Number 1 is the ARES/RACES standard, BTW