Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexers F S

2010-02-20 Thread Storer, Darren
Hi Jeff, I wouldn't worry about being a member of the Batboard Discussion Forum, it's quite impossible to sign up as the "captcha" security device (jumbled letters and numbers) is the most fascist I've EVER encountered. There's no way that someone with minor visual impairment could ever sign up t

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexers F S

2010-02-20 Thread AJ
The cavities in this particular case are BpBr. Pics below: http://vwreact.org/sale/Item%2031-34.jpg http://vwreact.org/sale/Item%2031.1.jpg http://vwreact.org/sale/Item%2031.2.jpg On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jeff DePolo wrote: > > > > The 4 WaCom UHF 10" cavities I believe were designed to

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexers F S

2010-02-20 Thread Jeff DePolo
> The 4 WaCom UHF 10" cavities I believe were designed to be > part of a simple duplexer for a UHF-Lo repeater. They > *should* tune up to the 440 ham band based on what Telewave > has listed for specs on the current modern day model number. > Current config is Pass RX Reject TX on 3 cans and P

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Duplexers F S

2010-02-19 Thread AJ
Oddly enough, that's my ad ;) Thanks for the bump. The 4 WaCom UHF 10" cavities I believe were designed to be part of a simple duplexer for a UHF-Lo repeater. They *should* tune up to the 440 ham band based on what Telewave has listed for specs on the current modern day model number. Current confi