Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather Receivers - follow up

2008-05-31 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Yes, this is a good point to mention. However, it would become painfully obvious at some point. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:18 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather Receivers - follow up

2008-05-31 Thread Ron Wright
For 2 minutes I would think a weather alert would be more helpful than what the net was covering. All should hear the weather alert in most all cases. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather Receivers - follow up

2008-05-31 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Depending on the circumstances, we'll probably turn the receiver off during a weather net and let the net control pass the info on. OTOH, it'd be easy enough to switch in a voltage divider to allow two different audio levels. P.S. The club may be passing the hat to buy a WX-200 from CAT

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather Receivers - follow up

2008-05-31 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Please do! Mike WM4B From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ks4ec Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 10:59 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather Receivers - follow up I am actually working on this, this

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Weather Receivers - follow up

2008-05-29 Thread Ron Wright
Unit price is high and appears have to buy serial cable and programming software. One can get a SAME receiver for lot less money and these have on board keyboard programming, but I did note the receiver had a serial port, I guess for programming, but could other things be using the port. I