HI Bob, Very long no talk to. I would go with the Kenwood repeater over the
Vertex. But my first choice would be Motorola. That what us guys in Wicsonsin
use 73's Bob. From Rick WB9RJB
--- On Thu, 10/2/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 10:14 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Vertex vs. Kenwood
Hi Joe,
I'm still trying to comprehend why you would need replacements just
because a site is more
Hi Guys,
Thank you to all who responded to my inquiry, through the list and
privately, for your insight. The tech committee now has more info on which to
base its
decision.
73,
Bob, WA9FBO
**New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination.
Dining, Movies,
my question exactly -- if the new site is quieter and you had the
duplexer cranked back (insertion loss increased) to get better
isolation, you may may even be able to open it up a little and get some
additional receive sensitivity... other than that, why change what works
unless there are
] On Behalf Of John Barrett
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 12:53 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Vertex vs. Kenwood
my question exactly -- if the new site is quieter and you had the
duplexer cranked back (insertion loss increased) to get better
isolation, you
to change once again. The bias is
toward new, low-maintenance gear rather than refurbished old commercial gear.
73,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: MCH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 9:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Vertex vs. Kenwood
is 35-40 watts, we set ours
around 25-30 since they can grind for many hours continuously.
Joe
--- On Fri, 10/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Vertex vs. Kenwood
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday
again. The
bias is toward new, low-maintenance gear rather than refurbished old
commercial gear.
73,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: MCH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 9:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Vertex vs. Kenwood
I'm still
,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: MCH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 9:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Vertex vs. Kenwood
I'm still trying to comprehend why you would need replacements just
because a site is more quiet. If they work
I'm still trying to comprehend why you would need replacements just
because a site is more quiet. If they work at the crowded site, they
should work fine at the quiet one.
Joe M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
My club has some 3-year-old VHF and UHF Vertex repeaters at a high-RF
site.
10 matches
Mail list logo