Dave,
Mike is correct. One should use low side for low freq and high for high freq
regardless of rx and tx. Completely forgot about this.
73, ron, n9ee/r
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/19 Thu PM 02:15:01 EDT
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wright
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:32 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 633-6a-2n notch duplexer
Dave,
Mike is correct. One should use low side
Eric,
I'm curious how this would phenomenon evidence itself on a network analyzer.
I ask because I was planning on doing just this (use a notch duplexer rather
than Bp/Br) for a low power repeater application I am working on for the
future... and the guy who tunes my duplexers locally uses a
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 633-6a-2n notch duplexer
Eric,
I'm curious how this phenomenon would evidence itself on a network analyzer.
I ask because I was planning on doing just this (use a notch duplexer rather
than Bp/Br) for a low power repeater application I am working
Thanks Eric; I feel more comfortable with my plan now.
Mark - N9WYS
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Mark,
I assume that Celwave uses a network analyzer when setting the coupling
loops, and tweaks them for maximum return loss at the
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of n9wys
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 4:30 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 633-6a-2n notch duplexer
Eric,
I'm curious how this phenomenon would evidence itself on a network analyzer.
I ask because I
6 matches
Mail list logo
