Re: ham websites (was: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link)

2008-05-21 Thread Wayne
That explains it pretty well. Any time there is something like that, I would normally put a link to it on one of my web sites. I am aware that part 97 does change, as well as other parts of the rules. Of course, some people are so far behind that the code being dropped has not come to t

ham websites (was: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link)

2008-05-19 Thread Nate Duehr
Wayne wrote: > Why is it that it seems to be hard to locate the updated part 97.201 > other than on the ARRL web site? > I searched and searched but only came up with the older version till I > searched on the ARRL site. Because most hams who have websites are clueless that Part 97 ever c