[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 09:05:06 AM:
Must every artivact have the version in the file name?
Definitely.
Some artifacts don't like having the full version number.
dll for example. I think the DLL name needs to be stable and thus
"Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 09:10:44 AM:
> Folks wrote:
> Are we discussing URI or URL? If URI, ok good .. but is this current?
>
> I thought it was more like (w/ pseudo-regexp notation):
>
> http:jars/[-][-].ext
'jars' is the of the thing. e.g. jars, tlds
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 09:05:06 AM:
> So here are some open questions.
>
> How do we pick unique human readable top level directories, in other
> words how do we name the directories for projects ad sub-projects.
Again, only as an example, maven takes the subproje
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is still some naming details to work out. An apache project can
be a very big thing.
Take the CLI project in Jakarta commons that would be
apache-jakarta-commons-cli
vs the pacakge name org.apache.commons.cli
This is where the previous naming conventi
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 08:38:36 AM:
> >Since this is an ASF repo, isn't the ASF project name enough?
> >
> >
> >
> I think I would still prefix it with apache, so that other organizations
> can follow our pattern with out conflicts. Also allowing other
> reposito
Here is the goals I think we shouould have for a project reference scheme.
* Human Readable
* globaly unique
* stable over long periods of time
If these are reasonable goals, then we should start evalutating the
merrits of different approaches.
R,
Nick
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME C
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Folks wrote:
So here is a key focuossed issue.
What should the URI look like
The latest URI discussed was
http:/artifact-[].ext
For example
* http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar
Are we discussing URI or URL? If URI, ok good .. but is this c
Folks wrote:
> >
> > So here is a key focuossed issue.
> > What should the URI look like
> >
> > The latest URI discussed was
> >
> > http:/artifact-[].ext
> >
> > For example
> > * http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar
Are we discussing URI or URL? If URI, ok good .. but
So here are some open questions.
How do we pick unique human readable top level directories, in other
words how do we name the directories for projects ad sub-projects.
Should each version have its own subdir?
Should each artifact type have it's own subir?
Do we support both version and type su
Dion: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First, Dion, what would you like to see? What are your goals for this
>
> I was hoping to revive some discussion. Last time things jumped to code
> and then stopped.
I hear you, and I don't want to see that either. There are so many complex
issues involved her
Nick Chalko wrote:
...
What should the URI look like
The latest URI discussed was
http:/artifact-[].ext
For example
* http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-1.5.1.jar
* http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/ant-testutil-1.5.1.jar
* http://repo.apache.org/org-apache-ant/1.5.1/LICE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Special versions. =
Most people agree we should support Latest (released), and Nightly,
along with the normal released builds
Maven also has 'SNAPSHOT' which is similar in context to Nightly, but not
necessarily built on a nightly basis.
+1
The part still n
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/10/2003 05:43:38 AM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >Simple focussed discussion without talking about incubating projects or
> >adopting projects works for me. Those are separate issues.
>
> So here is a key focuossed issue.
> What should the URI
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The part still needs to be decided is the project name.
I think the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with -
instead of .
Let's be careful. We should be -1 to anything that is Java-specific in such
manner as to preclude non-Java projects. Reme
> The part still needs to be decided is the project name.
> I think the most stable idea proposed is the java package name with -
> instead of .
Let's be careful. We should be -1 to anything that is Java-specific in such
manner as to preclude non-Java projects. Rememnber: this is the ASF
Repos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple focussed discussion without talking about incubating projects or
adopting projects works for me. Those are separate issues.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-k
Ok so Lets talking about what the goals for a Apache Repository are.
I propose
* ASF Repository shall
o only host artifacts approved by a PMC
o be accessible to the public via http
o be mirrorable.
o allow browsing and downloding of artifacts by humans via
"Adam R. B. Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/10/2003 02:46:15 AM:
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me that Dion put out a feeler with "Is anyone interested in
> reviving this project?" and a few of us (with unbounded passion)
launched in
> w/ gobs of information/opinions. Maybe this was just a one tim
18 matches
Mail list logo
