On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
>
+1 from me. Also +1 for managing the transaction at this level, if
feasible.
Chris
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I have been working with repoze.zodbconn (in conjunction with repoze.bfg
> and Karl 3) and there have been several times when I wish I could just
> insert some WSGI component that does something with the ZODB connection.
>
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> To make tasks like these easier, I would like to add to repoze.zodbconn
> a WSGI framework component that opens a ZODB connection, puts that
> connection in the WSGI environment, calls the next WSGI app in the
> chain, then closes the same ZODB connection on the way out.
On 6/9/09 4:25 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Tres was after the same thing earlier today so I think it's a good idea.
>
> We could also change the PersistentApplicationFinder to look in the
> environment
> for an open connection and use it instead of trying to open one itself.
(FTR, I didn't mean
Chris McDonough wrote:
> Tres was after the same thing earlier today so I think it's a good idea.
Ok. I'm happy to let Tres do it if he wants. :-)
> We could also change the PersistentApplicationFinder to look in the
> environment for an open connection and use it instead of trying to open
> o
Tres was after the same thing earlier today so I think it's a good idea.
We could also change the PersistentApplicationFinder to look in the environment
for an open connection and use it instead of trying to open one itself.
On 6/9/09 4:16 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been work
Hi all,
I have been working with repoze.zodbconn (in conjunction with repoze.bfg
and Karl 3) and there have been several times when I wish I could just
insert some WSGI component that does something with the ZODB connection.
Specifically:
- At one point I wanted repoze.who.plugins.zodb to us
