On Mon 2016-11-07 09:14:00 -0500, HW42 wrote:
> 1) Currently the diff contains only stuff which should be fixed. If we
>include .buildinfo differences it will include stuff which should not
>be "fixed" (and can't be by the package maintainer).
What if we only included the .buildinfo
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:58:29PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/job/reproducible_create_meta_pkg_sets/501/console
> > was the one running your commit…
> Apologies for the breakage.
that wasnt my point, my point was: I liked your code, I would have
https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/job/reproducible_create_meta_pkg_sets/501/console
> was the one running your commit…
Apologies for the breakage.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:38:17PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Sure. That was the behaviour I was attempting to keep/ensure.
https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/job/reproducible_create_meta_pkg_sets/501/console
was the one running your commit…
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Holger Levsen wrote:
> it should just not break the whole script. IOW: even if the tails pkg
> set cannot be updated, the other pkg sets following it should still
> done…
Sure. That was the behaviour I was attempting to keep/ensure.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:19:21PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> You have no choice, otherwise ``manifest`` is not defined. Well, it will
> break horribly *anyway* as you print to stdout and then use that output
> in the shell below... :)
it should just not break the whole script. IOW: even if the
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for week 80's blog post:
Published. Thanks to all :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing
> > commit 8309468c3378df91ca09aa8cd100c6ab326548fa
>
> I don't like the sys.exit(0) bit in here…
You have no choice, otherwise ``manifest`` is not defined. Well, it will
break horribly *anyway* as you print to stdout and then use that output
in the shell below... :)
Regards,
--
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:29:14PM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> commit 04506ef56be76324a5f531f5b436facc93da77db
> commit b686ae15509e5a8dff093908b6ae8d03a9294fab
> commit 91e10449b38f1cb6d5a7ebbc45a308ccf07e20b6
> commit de3c752982c2f4a762ef8fa27a1b6728b2aa1216
> commit
FYI: The status of the diffoscope source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 61
Current version: 62
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
diffoscope_62~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
diffoscope_62~bpo8+1.dsc
diffoscope_62~bpo8+1.tar.xz
diffoscope_62~bpo8+1_all.deb
trydiffoscope_62~bpo8+1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:41:00PM +, HW42 wrote:
>> I removed the filter from Reiner and replaced it with a 'sed' filtering
>> out the .buildinfo entries from the .changes file. So diffoscope should
>> not compare the .buildinfos (and the files refered by them) at all.
>
>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:41:00PM +, HW42 wrote:
> I removed the filter from Reiner and replaced it with a 'sed' filtering
> out the .buildinfo entries from the .changes file. So diffoscope should
> not compare the .buildinfos (and the files refered by them) at all.
Ah, right, I missed the
Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 10:04:00PM +, HW42 wrote:
>> (As I wrote an hour ago on irc,) See last 3 commit at
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/hw42-guest/jenkins.debian.net.git/
>
>
>> commit fdb7a50073ef9e3b8d22176b63817a78c928d73c
>> Author: HW42
package: diffoscope
If you compare two .changes containing .buildinfo in them, diffoscope
will work its way through the binaries twice, through:
.changes → .deb → file
.changes → .buildinfo → .deb → file
This leads to:
* double comparison time
* differences reported twice in the report
Source: node-dateformat
Version: 1.0.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
node-dateformat fails to build from source in
Source: hyperscan
Version: 4.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
hyperscan fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
Source: haskell-fail
Version: 4.9.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
haskell-fail fails to build from source in
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 10:04:00PM +, HW42 wrote:
> (As I wrote an hour ago on irc,) See last 3 commit at
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/hw42-guest/jenkins.debian.net.git/
> commit fdb7a50073ef9e3b8d22176b63817a78c928d73c
> Author: HW42
> Date: Sun Nov 6
Hi,
Attached is the following:
commit 04506ef56be76324a5f531f5b436facc93da77db
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Mon Nov 7 13:23:37 2016 +
reproducible Debian: correct syntax for Python 3.
bin/reproducible_create_meta_pkg_sets.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:29:50AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> commit 8a8ff7c1ecfcbaee346b96a17db0bf9865939642
> reproducible Debian: buildinfo.debian.net has moved to SSL.
merged on irc, thanks!
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Attached is the following:
commit 8a8ff7c1ecfcbaee346b96a17db0bf9865939642
Author: Chris Lamb
Date: Sun Nov 6 21:12:54 2016 +
reproducible Debian: buildinfo.debian.net has moved to SSL.
bin/reproducible_build.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
22 matches
Mail list logo