On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 06:50:13 + Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> indeed possibly some temporary glitch, it's now marked as reproducible.
> (holger rescheduled it)
>
> Thanks for notifying us :)
Thanks to you all for your kind replies and for rescheduling the
reproducibility test!:-)
Bye.
--
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:41:33PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Thursday, July 21 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Now, after the latest upload to unstable, I noticed that apt-listbugs
> > was not considered reproducible on armhf [2]. The log states:
> >
> > E: the second build
On Thursday, July 21 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Now, after the latest upload to unstable, I noticed that apt-listbugs
> was not considered reproducible on armhf [2]. The log states:
>
> E: the second build failed, even though the first build was successful.
>
> I am not sure I understand
Hello reproducible build folks!
I have recently encountered another reproducibility issue with
apt-listbugs. You may remember me from the previous issue [1].
Now, after the latest upload to unstable, I noticed that apt-listbugs
was not considered reproducible on armhf [2]. The log states:
E:
Hello reproducible build hackers!
I am the maintainer of apt-listbugs and I have recently noticed that it
was not built reproducibly [1]. The issue seemed to be due to the month
and year inserted by rdtool into the man page.
However, now it seems to be built reproducibly [2].
I am not sure the
[ following the Reply-To I won't add Francesco to the To/Cc ]
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > Is this something that should be
Hi Francesco,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I am the maintainer of apt-listbugs and I have recently noticed that it
> was not built reproducibly [1]. The issue seemed to be due to the month
> and year inserted by rdtool into the man page.
We already have an
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:39 +0100 Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
Hi Reiner,
thanks for your kind reply!
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:23:45PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Is this something that should be fixed in rdtool [3]? If this is the
> > case, could you please file a