Hi Santiago,
I think you are confusing repeatable builds with reproducible builds.
When we talk about reproducible builds, we mean what we documented at
https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/definition/
to quote from there: "A build is reproducible if given the same source
code, build environment
Santiago Vila:
> Greetings.
>
> Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, I'd
> like to be sure that there is a consensus.
>
> What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like A or more like B?
>
> A. Every time the package is attempted to build, the build succe
On 2017-01-16, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there, I'd
> like to be sure that there is a consensus.
>
> What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like A or more like B?
I don't know if you're aware of the recently created:
https:/
On 2017-01-16 11:26, Santiago Vila wrote:
Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there,
I'd
like to be sure that there is a consensus.
What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like A or more like
B?
A. Every time the package is attempted to build, the build s
On 2017-01-16 14:28, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:19:44PM +, Paul Sherwood wrote:
On 2017-01-16 11:26, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there,
> I'd
> like to be sure that there is a consensus.
>
> What's the definitio
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:19:44PM +, Paul Sherwood wrote:
> On 2017-01-16 11:26, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Before I use this rationale more times in some discussions out there,
> > I'd
> > like to be sure that there is a consensus.
> >
> > What's the definition of reproducible? It is more like
