[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] 1 new request-sponsor putback: 39 total

2006-03-08 Thread Karyn Ritter
[Apologies if this has already been responded to... I'm catching up.] The code for bugs.opensolaris.org (and bugs.sun.com) are not sophisticated enough to be able to do this. The application we use currently shares the same code base as bugs.sun.com. Because Suggested Fix often contains code

[request-sponsor] CR 6368816: closed by integration of Intel ACPI CA update

2006-03-08 Thread Dana H. Myers
Rob Benson reported CR 6368816, an issue in the Intel-maintained ACPI CA source. I forwarded the report to Bob Moore at Intel, and a subsequent release of ACPI CA source incorporates the suggested changes. CR 6368816 itself is technically a duplicate of CR 6354619 - update to the 20060217

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-08 Thread Danek Duvall
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we don't require people to update the fixed in bugster. People have suggested that we

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-08 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:06:46PM -0800, Danek Duvall wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we don't require

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

2006-03-08 Thread Dave Miner
Danek Duvall wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:40:39PM -0700, Sanjay Nadkarni wrote: I will back this up from the request sponser POV. In my case an RPE engineer had already fixed the bug and putback into Nevada. However we don't require people to update the fixed in bugster. People