Hi Valerie,
> That's not the right place for the bug to be, as defect.opensolaris.org
> is currently only supposed to be used for things in development - things
> that aren't integrated into the source base.
I'm sorry for having missed that bit.
> I'm working with some internal people to figure
6431132: legacy yacc code cannot be maintained or understood
Update from the sponsor of this bug indicates that this request is
dead. The contributor has no access to a Solaris system the code, what
he contributed does not match the bug and the whole thing was massively
unclean. Please rem
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Nils Goroll wrote:
> Hi Valerie,
>
>> That's not the right place for the bug to be, as defect.opensolaris.org
>> is currently only supposed to be used for things in development - things
>> that aren't integrated into the source base.
>
> I'm sorry for having missed that bit.
Nils Goroll wrote:
> Do I need to request a sponsor for bugzilla bugs or is anyone monitoring
> all bugzilla bugs? Sorry, have posted a "legacy bug" with identical content.
> webrev with fix is ready for review - who is going to ask for review for this
> one?
Which bug tracking system is used does
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Nils Goroll wrote:
> Do I need to request a sponsor for bugzilla bugs or is anyone monitoring
> all bugzilla bugs? Sorry, have posted a "legacy bug" with identical content.
> webrev with fix is ready for review - who is going to ask for review for this
> one?
>
> http://defect
Do I need to request a sponsor for bugzilla bugs or is anyone monitoring
all bugzilla bugs? Sorry, have posted a "legacy bug" with identical content.
webrev with fix is ready for review - who is going to ask for review for this
one?
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3093
This me
