[request-sponsor] Re: sponsor request for CR6482159

Linda can take care of getting this added... - Karyn Stephen Lau wrote: > Masayuki Murayama wrote: > >> It seems that CR 6482159 disappeared from the bug database now. >> Was it rejected? >> >> >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> ___ >>

[request-sponsor] Re: outstanding requests

By the way, you can find the list of outstanding requests at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports/request_sponsor/ . Thanks, Karyn Karyn Ritter wrote: > We've currently got ~18 requests waiting for sponsors (with the oldest > request waiting for 2 months). If you have time

[request-sponsor] Our 100th putback

I don't want to over-use this alias, but... Congratulations and Thanks to you all! - Karyn Bonnie Corwin wrote: > Hi, > > I updated the request-sponsor table this afternoon with pubs work that > has been happening that wasn't captured on the table. Those items have > been inserted chronologic

[request-sponsor] outstanding requests

We've currently got ~18 requests waiting for sponsors (with the oldest request waiting for 2 months). If you have time to sponsor, please accept a new request or two. It'd be great to not have any requests awaiting sponsor by the end of the quarter. Meeting this goal for the anniversary would b

[request-sponsor] requests awaiting a sponsor...

Just a quick reminder that there are now 39 requests awaiting a sponsor. The oldest was submitted on 2/3, and you probably noticed the large influx of requests over the last several days. If you have time, please volunteer to pick up a request (or 16): my assumption is that related requests wil

[request-sponsor] Sponsor request for 6249706

Valerie already beat you to it. :) Darren J Moffat wrote: > Stephen Potter wrote: > >> rbac utilities have unused variables >> >> http://www.unixsa.net/drupal/?q=node/37 > > > I'll sponsor this one. >

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867. It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet, which is why you can't find it on bugs.opensolaris.org. - Karyn Rainer Orth wrote: > Two days ago, I opened a new CR on bugs.opensolaris.org > > Revive UltraSPARC I support > >

[request-sponsor] 6409228, 6409251, 6409254, 6409257: Various trivial errors and typos

Rainer Orth wrote: > I'd like to find sponsors for the following bugs: > > 6409228 typo in aclutils.h > 6409251 typo in stmsboot > 6409254 variables in svc-syseventd > 6409257 /vfstab isn't properly aligned > > and also the following (which I think I've already submitted to > bugs.opensolaris.o

[request-sponsor] Re: Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

FYI -- There's been more discussion of this on opensolaris-discuss ( http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=6854 ). I didn't want to cross-post, and decided the main discussion should live on -discuss. Apologies for the delay in letting you all know. - Karyn Valerie Anne Bubb wr

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

have now, but if people have suggestions for how we might implement that, please provide details. All of this is just an interim solution until we have better bug searching capabilities. My hope is that some day (soon) you'll be able to do a Keyword search of 'oss-bite-size&

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

I'll figure out where to put the definitions. This the real status that is in Bugster, so we need to document it anyway Thanks, Karyn Bill Rushmore wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Karyn Ritter wrote: > > >>Would something like the table I've just created at

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] 1 new request-sponsor putback: 39 total

[Apologies if this has already been responded to... I'm catching up.] The code for bugs.opensolaris.org (and bugs.sun.com) are not sophisticated enough to be able to do this. The application we use currently shares the same code base as bugs.sun.com. Because Suggested Fix often contains code th

[request-sponsor] Re: [osol-discuss] Contributing Code

Bill, Bill Rushmore wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Jim Grisanzio wrote: > > >>* For those who are thinking about contributing code, what can we do to >> help you get started? Would more oss-bite-size bugs help? > > > More oss-bite-size would be nice. I also have a couple of suggestions for >

[request-sponsor] Re: Re: [osol-discuss] 1 new request-sponsorputback: 39 total

We've got several RFEs for Bugster, but I don't know how many of them we'll actually be able to get implemented. In the meantime, seems like people can search for the bug# in the source browser. After the build is available in the source browser, of course... - Karyn This message posted from op

[request-sponsor] [PATCH] 6249645 spec2trace passes Meta_info structure by value

So we should take all of these off the "awaiting sponsor" list? Thanks, Karyn Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:27:34PM -0700, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > >>>[PATCH] for bug 6249645 spec2trace passes Meta_info structure by value >>> >>>http://icculus.org/~eviltypeguy/624

[request-sponsor] Sponsorship application microfaq

Jim, I'm not sure if this should stay on this list or not, but I thought it was useful to have in the archive... I've been planning to send a "guidelines" email to this list for several days, and I'm still not quite there. Others will, no doubt, respond in more detail to your questions, but I

[request-sponsor] request to add Intel D865PERL onboard LAN support

I'm still working on the initial email about what processes you all should follow in responding to these messages. Expect to see something by tomorrow at the latest. In the meantime, it doesn't sound to me like this is actually a request for a sponsor. Does anyone want to follow up with Brian o