[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-05-03 Thread Rainer Orth
Peter, > Thanks for submitting the request to revive the UltraSPARC I > support. Rather than integrating this into the ON consolidation > due to engineering constraints (see below), the best way forward > is for this support to be maintained either by yourself > and/or an interested team of OpenSo

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-05-02 Thread Peter Dennis - Solaris Sustaining Engineering
Hello Rainer, Thanks for submitting the request to revive the UltraSPARC I support. Rather than integrating this into the ON consolidation due to engineering constraints (see below), the best way forward is for this support to be maintained either by yourself and/or an interested team of OpenSolar

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-25 Thread Rainer Orth
Jan, > Actually I've gotten quite good at the product/cat/subcat game. It > just takes filing a bunch of bugs. Given the stream I've gotten from > you (Rainer) in the past, I'm sure you'll be up to speed in no time. > :) probably :-) E.g., I've tried to build the sfwnv consolidation inside a lo

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-24 Thread Rainer Orth
Valerie Anne Bubb writes: [bugs.opensolaris.org categories/subcategories] > This is often a problem internally as well! :( So I'm not alone :-) > We're working on at least making new categories & subcategories > that come under the "solaris" umbrella to be more obvious > and fixing things whene

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-24 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> Valerie Anne Bubb writes: > > [bugs.opensolaris.org categories/subcategories] > > > This is often a problem internally as well! :( > > So I'm not alone :-) Actually I've gotten quite good at the product/cat/subcat game. It just takes filing a bunch of bugs. Given the stream I've gotten from

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-21 Thread Valerie Anne Bubb
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Rainer Orth wrote: > Karyn, > >> Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867. > > fine, thanks. > >> It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet, >> which is why you can't find it on bugs.opensolaris.org. > > Ok. I had some difficulty finding an app

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-21 Thread Rainer Orth
Karyn, > Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867. fine, thanks. > It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet, > which is why you can't find it on bugs.opensolaris.org. Ok. I had some difficulty finding an appropriate category myself. Btw., it would be useful t

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-20 Thread Rainer Orth
Two days ago, I opened a new CR on bugs.opensolaris.org Revive UltraSPARC I support Unlike the flurry of other reports I submitted at the same time, I haven't received the CR id yet. Anyway, this is a duplicate of 5004452 Should 64-bit UltraSPARC-I rise from the grave? which was previously clo

[request-sponsor] Revive UltraSPARC I support

2006-04-20 Thread Karyn Ritter
Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867. It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet, which is why you can't find it on bugs.opensolaris.org. - Karyn Rainer Orth wrote: > Two days ago, I opened a new CR on bugs.opensolaris.org > > Revive UltraSPARC I support > >