On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 08:18:18PM -0700, Mike Kupfer wrote:
dep One of the problems is that we have no good way to measure the
dep quality of their mentoring.
I think the idea was to treat the level-3 folks as interns, similar to
the way new ARC members are brought on board.
It's
On Thu 27 Oct 2005 at 08:18PM, Mike Kupfer wrote:
dep == David Powell David.Powell at sun.com writes:
dep One of the problems is that we have no good way to measure the
dep quality of their mentoring.
I think the idea was to treat the level-3 folks as interns, similar to
the way new
DP == David Powell David.Powell at Sun.COM writes:
DP If the owner is the one primarily responsible for communicating
DP with the contributor, yes. I think this would work fine.
To expand on what I think dep just said, this would relegate the intern to the
position of observer,
dp ARC interns are (afaik) already experienced engineers.
Yes, and they usually have non-trivial ARC experience, either as a
fast-track licensee or from multiple project submissions. I think that
translates into some minimum set of requirements to be a sponsorship
intern, which may well be
Mike Kupfer wrote On 10/28/05 11:52,:
dp ARC interns are (afaik) already experienced engineers.
Yes, and they usually have non-trivial ARC experience, either as a
fast-track licensee or from multiple project submissions. I think that
translates into some minimum set of requirements to be
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:30:00PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
So I think we have cycled back to where we started and where we
currently are: two tiers of sponsors with requirements for both tiers.
If we leave the current program alone and don't open it up, how do we
address the problem of
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 02:54:16PM -0700, David Powell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:30:00PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
So I think we have cycled back to where we started and where we
currently are: two tiers of sponsors with requirements for both tiers.
If we leave the current
Dave == David Powell David.Powell at Sun.COM writes:
Dave Mike and I have talked this over, and I think we're in agreement
Dave here.
Yes, this proposal makes a lot of sense to me.
mike
David Powell wrote On 10/26/05 17:10,:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:10:15PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Depending on how things go (which is hard to project at this point), it
might not be an issue. If we get a manageable number of third-tier
sponsors who do a good job, we shouldn't have a
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:33:29PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
I believe engineers interested in this work will be interested in
building relationships with external developers. And therefore will do
their best to represent Sun and explain engineering practices.
With this proposal, we will
dep == David Powell David.Powell at sun.com writes:
dep One of the problems is that we have no good way to measure the
dep quality of their mentoring.
I think the idea was to treat the level-3 folks as interns, similar to
the way new ARC members are brought on board.
It's been several
Hi Dave -
Thanks for re-sending - I had missed this.
You raise a good point - thanks for bringing it up.
Depending on how things go (which is hard to project at this point), it
might not be an issue. If we get a manageable number of third-tier
sponsors who do a good job, we shouldn't have a
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:10:15PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Depending on how things go (which is hard to project at this point), it
might not be an issue. If we get a manageable number of third-tier
sponsors who do a good job, we shouldn't have a problem.
How exactly do you determine if
Apologies for not being clear last week - let's try again.
Until we can allow external contributors to integrate directly to the
O/N gate, Sun developers (sponsors) are pairing with external developers
to follow the O/N code integration processes.
The original concept of sponsoring included two
If I can summarize to make sure I understand this.
Being a sponsor is not just about typing putback,
but it is actually moderately heavyweight in that
the sponsor is expected to build, test (maybe DIY test?),
and validate the changes. Frankly, in many cases that
may take more time than the actual
David Robinson wrote:
Being a sponsor is not just about typing putback,
but it is actually moderately heavyweight in that
the sponsor is expected to build, test (maybe DIY test?),
and validate the changes. Frankly, in many cases that
may take more time than the actual code change.
This is
16 matches
Mail list logo
