RBTools 0.4.1 released

Hey everyone. A couple users pointed out some regressions in RBTools 0.4.0. Python 2.4 support broke, and --diff-filename=- broke with --username and --password. We've released 0.4.1 with fixes for these. As always, let us know if you see any regressions! Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip.

Does Review Board provide Reporing?

Hi, I am still learning Review Board. I have couple of questions about reporting - (1) Does Review Board provide any reporting capabilities? If yes, do I need to install any upgrades. We are using RB 1.6 on RHEL . (2) Just in case no reporting available, is there a way I can access RB schema and cr

Re: Is it possible to install ReviewBoard without sudo?

On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 23:59 -0800, David Trowbridge wrote: > I won't rule it out entirely because I haven't tried, but I think it's > pretty unlikely that > you'll be able to install and configure everything that you need. Strictly speaking, you could install your own private Python installation

Bizarre Display Issues

Has anyone else had issues with the View Diff functionality in 1.6.4.1 causing some seriously bad arrangement? It seems to get about halfway through the loading of the Diff and then resizes into a terrible arrangement. It looks like it gets restricted to an 800 character wide page. -- Chris Tool

Re: Bizarre Display Issues

Submitting a resolution to my own issue. I noticed this in my logs: ImproperlyConfigured: Error importing middleware reviewboard.admin.middleware Which led me to updating pycrypto, which fixed the issue. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Chris Tooley wrote: > Has anyone else had issues with th

Re: uncaught exception after upgrading to 2.6.4.1

Yup. That solved the issue. On Feb 29, 12:33 pm, Christian Hammond wrote: > Can you try going to /admin/settings/ and save your cache backend there > again? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.

post-review and HTTP Auth doesn't seem to be working

If I turn off http auth around my install of review board post-review works just fine. If I turn it on no passing in of the --http-* parameters or setting of HTTP_* in the .reviewboardrc file works and always results in the exception listed below. I can do basic auth from multiple browsers and logi

Re: post-review and HTTP Auth doesn't seem to be working

The traceback seems to have been cut off. Do you have the last few lines? -David On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Joshua Shanks wrote: > If I turn off http auth around my install of review board post-review > works just fine. If I turn it on no passing in of the --http-* > parameters or settin

Re: post-review and HTTP Auth doesn't seem to be working

looks like I clipped the last line, reran and full output below. $ post-review Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/post-review", line 9, in load_entry_point('RBTools==0.4.1', 'console_scripts', 'post- review')() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/RBTools-0.4.

Re: Review board hanging / access issue..

Hi Chris, Thank you for your assistance. Looks like the Powers-that-be around here are reasonable keen to see us upgrade to 1.6.4.1 and change to using MySQL as the database (from 1.5.4 using SQLite.) Do you have any suggestions on the best way to do this? - I will have the opportunity to migra

Re: post-review and HTTP Auth doesn't seem to be working

I just installed and tried this with all versin of RBTools from 2.0 to 4.1 and 3.3 seems to get it the most right but even that doesn't work $ rm ~/.post-review-cookies.txt ; post-review ==> HTTP Authentication Required Enter authorization information for "Development" at hostname Username: josh P