Parent Dif - Options

I have configured hg repository module in review board . Parent Diff : What i have to give here ( I have given base diff contents but its not shown reviewboard ) ( An optional diff that the main diff is based on. This is usually used for distributed revision control systems (Git, Merc

Re: reviewboard 1.6.11 and reviewing problems with FireFox 3.6 and IE 9

On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:12:08 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: > > The IE thing is weird, because I don't think anything should have changed > as far as text entry goes in a while... Which IE? > The IE behavior may not be new, for the version see the title (9) but recall it was seen

Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12

I wish I had some idea, but that's just plain weird. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Igor Berger wrote: > Different error: > > > # easy_install -U Review

Re: reviewboard 1.6.11 and reviewing problems with FireFox 3.6 and IE 9

Hi Chris, The IE thing is weird, because I don't think anything should have changed as far as text entry goes in a while... Which IE? For Firefox, is there anything in the JavaScript console? Installing Firebug (you may need an older one for FF3.6) would give you a lot more useful information. C

Re: Screenshots for version 1.7?

On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:26:36 AM UTC-7, Robert Dailey wrote: > > Are there any screenshots I can look at for various UI improvements > for version 1.7? What do code review pages look like? > Have you seen the live site http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3347/ ? -- Want to help the R

reviewboard 1.6.11 and reviewing problems with FireFox 3.6 and IE 9

We upgraded a few weeks ago to 1.6.11 and we've hit a few minor problems. For IE users when they edit the description the newlines disappear and they get one massive line of text. Some times this occurs when viewing the description too and not editing. The IE compatibility mode usually helps wi

Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12

Different error: # easy_install -U ReviewBoard==1.6.12 Searching for ReviewBoard==1.6.12 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/ Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

We don't build packages on Windows, so likely new parts of our build infrastructure are assuming unixisms. Christian On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:21, kvr wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: > Can you show me what happened when you tried? Ther

Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12

Very weird. How about ReviewBoard==1.6.12 ? Christian On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:35, Igor Berger wrote: > To verify connectivity, I tried the following command, which worked: > > curl -o dummy.egg > http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ReviewBoard-1.6.12-py2.7.egg > > -- >

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released

Exactly. ;-) I don't know root cause, but it seems environment issue, not ReviewBoard solution. I'll try to found out root cause and I'll come back. On Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:56:58 PM UTC+4, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Just to clarify, you did an rb-site upgrade, and th

Re: easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12

To verify connectivity, I tried the following command, which worked: curl -o dummy.egg http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ReviewBoard-1.6.12-py2.7.egg -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at

easy_install doesn't find 1.6.12

Hello, Looks like it happens for every release. I'm trying to upgrade 1.6.11 to 1.6.12. I can see that 1.6.12 is already available in both http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6 and http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard. However, "easy_install -U ReviewBoard" doesn't fi

Re: Dull problem when trying to automate post-commit review with svn

Hello Christian. I am not running sudo anywhere in the script. This is the full hook script I already posted: *===repo/hooks/post-commit script paste start===* *REPOS="$1"* *REV=$(($2))* *OLDREV=$(($REV-1))* *RBSRV="h

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 1 released

On Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:22:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Can you show me what happened when you tried? There are certain things > that must be installed in order to build the package. > > Christian > > I issued the following command to build the beta 1.7 code. >

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released

Hi Michael, Just to clarify, you did an rb-site upgrade, and the resulting symlinks were broken? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Michael Zhilin wrote: > Hi Ch

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released

Hi Christian, Thank you for quick response. I forgot to do upgrade. But after upgrade,symbolic links inside static folder became broken. [reviewer@reviewboard01 static]$ ls -asl total 28 4 drwxrwxr-x 2 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 . 4 drwxr-xr-x 4 reviewer reviewer 4096 Sep 27 12:22 .. 4

Re: Dull problem when trying to automate post-commit review with svn

I didn't see it in your script, but are you running the script as sudo in the hook somewhere? What distro are you running? Is SELinux turned on? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Sep 26,