On 03/03/2014 10:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/23/2014 05:33 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Thanks, Stephen! That's above and beyond.
>>
>> Hope this makes it easier for some of you to try out the betas. We're
>> making good progress on a third beta/RC, so keep the feedback coming!
>>
>>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Christian Hammond
wrote:
> We have a lot we want to do in this coming year, both on the open source
> and commercial fronts.
>
Chris,
Do those plans include anything re Gerrit? Much as I love RB's UI I have
given up (at least for now) having my company adopt RB b
>
> Hi Chris,
>
I was impressed by RB and still looks great for our needs but the
integration with TortoiseHg is bad. I would say it's not working at all.
What I was hoping to acomplish and hoping to push to the client as the new
way of ensuring the code quality (by not allowing merges until th
It does include DVCS support and new hooks for enforcing review request
approval before commit.
Which features specifically are you wondering about?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Fri,
Review Board 2.0 has a new concept of "approval" that can be customized by
extensions. See
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/extending/extensions/hooks/review-request-approval-hook/
There's also work being done on hooks for Mercurial and Git that would
allow you to enforce that a review r
Sorry for the late response. I missed this reply.
For Apache settings the worker and prefork configurations are the exact
same between the two vms:
# prefork MPM
# StartServers: number of server processes to start
# MinSpareServers: minimum number of server processes which are kept spare
# MaxSpa
Hi Ze,
The spikes every 5 minutes are interesting. Sounds like a cronjob or
something, perhaps? Are you using search indexing?
What are you using for the database?
Remind me what version of RB you guys are using?
- Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www
