Can you look in the /tmp/ directory it shows and see what the diff looks like?
It sounds like the patch isn’t valid.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On June 25, 2014 at 7:55:36 PM, hoà
Hmm, it should be called under those conditions.
Just to check, are you using the Local Sites feature? (If you don’t know what
that is, then no.)
Can you also just verify in Authentication Settings that it’s Active Directory
and not LDAP?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc
I looked into the Windows installer. I love the idea of getting one in, but at
the moment, neither of us have Visual Studio, so we need to figure out if we
want that as a dependency or if we want to evaluate something else (like NSIS).
There’s also the matter of integrating this with our build s
Dear Mr Christian Hammond,
- When i go to folder /tmp in RB server, there is a folder
*reviewboard.JZeo6R.
*But I can not enter this folder or cat or do anything else.
- I am afraid that may be i had a mistake when configured Repository for
Perforce. There is any special required for intergr
You’ll need to access that directory as root.
Your process looks fine, but something’s certainly wrong. We’ll know more once
you can look at the files in that directory.
We also generally recommend using .reviewboardrc instead of ‘p4 counter’, but
this isn’t the cause of any problem.
Christian
I'm trying to use Search with ReviewBoard 2.0.2. I simply checked "Enable
search" and left the "Search index directory" empty (which the docs say
lets it use the default). Then I did rb-site manage /path/to/my/site
rebuild_index which warned me and then said this.
Removing all documents from y
Dear Mr Christian,
> Actually when i used root, i still can not go into it. I think i do
> something wrong so i am re-installing RB rightnow.
>
> Anyway, nice to hear about .reviewboardrc. May you say more detail about
this. Because as i know, this file can be generate after using rbt
setup-r
>
> Dear Mr Christian,
>
> Actually when i used root, i still can not go into it. I think i do
> something wrong so i am re-installing RB rightnow.
> Anyway, nice to hear about .reviewboardrc. May you say more detail about
> this. Because as i know, this file can be generate after using rbt
>
>
> After reinstall, I make a new request i face the same problem
>
> *Exception: The patch to '//depot/P4Test/new 2.txt' didn't apply cleanly.
> The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.GPEAUp' for debugging
> purposes.
`patch` returned: patch: Only garbage was found in th
Hi All,
I am a newbie with Reviewboard. And i have a question, i hope you guys can
help me to find out.
i am wondering that does Reviewboard support to view .PPT and .PDF file?
Because i need to make a Reviewboard site for my team to upload and view
also source code and some office files.
If re
I'm running Review Board 2.0.1. Is it normal to get quite a lot of the
following messages in reviewboard.log?
2014-06-26 00:26:59,410 - WARNING - - Attempting to override insert count
on FileDiffData 569c03ed942572b0d790d8db2ea1c4b49dbdcd4e from 196 to None (F
ileDiff None)
2014-06-26 00:26:59,41
Local Site: Not that I'm aware. (I don't know what it is...)
Yep, Authentication Settings are Active Directory. (New Users can login
via AD just fine.)
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 12:49:57 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hmm, it should be called under those conditions.
>
> Just to check,
I installed RB 2.0 version on a RHEL 6.5 . I installed all the pre
requisites and created RB site and added the line in
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Include /var/www/mytest.example.com/conf/apache-wsgi.conf
Everything else in httpd.conf is default settings. But am only seeing the
directory listi
...I get the feeling my changes to the python are somehow not being
actually run.
Is there a place I can put a logging.debug() call that absolutely gets hit
100% of the time to make sure i can see it?
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 9:19:22 AM UTC-7, fireworm wrote:
>
> Local Site: Not that I'm awar
Ok, adding garbage text to the python is not causing the server to go down,
I'm thinking my updates aren't taking effect.
More sanity checking: I don't have any of the developer code installed and
am modifying the install itself, right? I don't need to update an
executable somewhere forcibly?
Yeah, it does sound like it’s not executing.
Try removing the .pyc file, just to check.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On June 26, 2014 at 10:12:41 AM, fireworm (firewor...@gmail.com)
Hi there,
Is there a way to post a single review request that spans multiple repos
(using git)? I.e. one review request that contains relevant changes for 2+
repos instead of one separate review board request for each respective repo.
Thanks,
Dan
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://
Hi Dan,
Sorry, there’s no way to do this. A lot would need to change to allow it to
happen.
What I’d recommend is just having two (or more) review requests, and using
Depends On to relate them.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.or
I'm trying to tabulate how many reviews I have posted on my company's
review board. Is there any way to do this? I'm using verison 1.7.14.
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
H
Removed the pyc file (review_request.pyc).
Set myself as the owner (not www-data or admin or whatever).
Restarted apache.
Refreshed the review webpage.
Page loaded just fine, no pyc next to review_request.py.
Seems super suspicious.
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:47:41 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond
Hi Ian,
Just to check, is that directory and everything in it writeable by the web
server?
Try running update_index with -v 3. You should hopefully get more useful info
out of it.
Also, which versions of Haystack and Whoosh?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review B
Ah ok. We'll use the "Depends On" link.
Thanks Christian!
Dan
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:50:43 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Sorry, there’s no way to do this. A lot would need to change to allow it
> to happen.
>
> What I’d recommend is just having two (or more) review
Looks like I have django_haystack-2.1.0-py2.7.egg
and Whoosh-2.6.0-py2.7.egg installed.
Everything appears to be writable by the web server (_www).
$ ls -l /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root admin 204 Dec 5 2013 conf
drwxr-xr-x 4 _www admin 136 Jun 26
What does rebuild_index with -v 3 show?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On June 26, 2014 at 2:32:22 PM, Ian (iander...@mac.com) wrote:
Looks like I have django_haystack-2.1.0-py2.7.egg
$ sudo -u _www rb-site manage /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard
rebuild_index -- -v 3
WARNING: This will irreparably remove EVERYTHING from your search index in
connection 'default'.
Your choices after this are to restore from backups or rebuild via the
`rebuild_index` command.
Are yo
If you install the Review Board Power Pack (
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/), PDF files will be reviewable
directly in the browser.
On any 1.7.x version, you can attach these files to review requests and
other users can download them.
-David
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:16 AM, hoàng tuấn
Bruce,
It looks like the conditionals around this logging are catching too much.
I'll get a fix in for the next 2.0.x.
-David
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I'm running Review Board 2.0.1. Is it normal to get quite a lot of the
> following messages in reviewboard.log?
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
