Formatting errors in description field

Hello everyone, I have upgraded our reviewboard installation from 1.7.x to 2.0.3. Unfortunately we have some issues with the formatting of the description field. We are using the post-review tool in our scripts to post our reviews. Inside the description field we put the git commit log entries.

Provide steps for upgrading review board 2.0.1 to review board 2.0.3

Hi All, Provide steps for upgrading review board 2.0.1 to review board 2.0.3 *Setup details as follow:* VMware OS Ubuntu 12.04 64Bit *BitNami Review Board*

Re: Provide steps for upgrading review board 2.0.1 to review board 2.0.3

on ubuntu 12.04 $ sudo easy_install -U ReviewBoard $ sudo rb-site upgrade /www/yourreviewboardsite/ On Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:55:31 AM UTC-4, Rama krishna wrote: > > Hi All, > Provide steps for upgrading review board 2.0.1 to review board 2.0.3 > > > *Setup details as follow:* > > VMware

How to stop new reviews being created on 1.6.16 from RBTools?

I'm in the middle of switching over to a new ReviewBoard server instance and I would like at some future point to prevent existing users from creating new reviews on the old RB instance. I'd like the active reviews on the old RB instance to continue to be accessed so they can be finalised and

Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review

*bump bump* Anyone? Still haven't figured out how to get a local change to the py scripts to reflect correctly in the running copy. On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:58 AM, fireworm wrote: > *bump* > > Anyone have any ideas? > > > On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:53:46 AM UTC-7, fireworm wrote: >> >> Rem

Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review

Do you also need to restart memcached? -- Bruce On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jason Batchkoff wrote: > *bump bump* > > Anyone? Still haven't figured out how to get a local change to the py > scripts to reflect correctly in the running copy. > -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http:/

Re: Formatting errors in description field

Can you show what the source markdown looks like? (Click the pencil and then copy/paste/redact) -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Philip Schiffer < philip.schif...@sprylab.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > I have upgraded our reviewboard installation from 1.7.x to 2.0.3. > Unfortunately we

Re: Unable to installing Extensions on RB 2.0.3

I am getting the same errors as MoonWalker. On Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:29:14 PM UTC-5, MoonWalker wrote: > > I am using RB 2.0.3 and I tried to install the following extensions but > seems like they are not available (easy_install is not able to find them) , > am I missing something here? > > h

Re: Adding a new diff to existent review Loops on loading

Can you use the "Network" tab to find the contents of the response (the one returning HTTP 400)? -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:44 PM, MoonWalker wrote: > sorry, this is the full one > > >1. POST http://codereview.devneta.local/api/review-requests/559/diffs/ >400 (BAD REQUEST) jquery

Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review

You probably need to delete the .pyc file and reload the web server. -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > Do you also need to restart memcached? > > -- > Bruce > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Jason Batchkoff > wrote: > >> *bump bump* >> >> Anyone? Still haven

Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request

Can you try running 'svn up' and retrying the 'rbt post' command? SVN sometimes has issues with partially-synced trees after certain types of operations. -David On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Shahadat Hossain wrote: > Dear Concern, > > I am using Reviewboard server 1.7.26 and RBTtools 0.5.7

Re: How to stop new reviews being created on 1.6.16 from RBTools?

Stephen, There's no good way to do this short of going in and modifying the code. Is there a reason that you're not just migrating everything over to the new server? -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Stephen wrote: > > I'm in the middle of switching over to a new ReviewBoard server inst

Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review

Yep, that's what I did. But it refuses to acknowledge I changed the actual execution logic... Or it's just super smart? For reference, here's what I'm doing: $ sudo chown -R [me] /usr/locla/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/reviewboard-2.0.1-py2.7.egg/ [delete review_request.pyc and backends.p

Re: Active Directory - Can't Assign New User to Review

That's pretty mysterious. Are you sure that the logging you added is in the correct places? -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:01 PM, fireworm wrote: > Yep, that's what I did. But it refuses to acknowledge I changed the > actual execution logic... Or it's just super smart? > > For reference, h

Re: SCMError: OPTIONS of 'http://:/svn': could not connect to server (http://:)

It turns out that my Review Board VM didn't like the SSL certificate of my SVN VM. Once I resolved that, everything worked as expected. To answer your question, no, there was no proxy involved. Thanks for responding! --Jamie On Monday, June 16, 2014 11:52:02 AM UTC-4, Jamie Gruener wrote: > >

unable to easy_install rbnotefield from Beanbag, Inc.

If I try to install rbnotefield I get an error about a hostname mismatch: [root@reviews ~]# easy_install -U rbnotefield > Searching for rbnotefield > Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/rbnotefield/ > Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/ > Download error on http://www.reviewboard.org/: hostname

Re: unable to easy_install rbnotefield from Beanbag, Inc.

Jamie, It looks like we had a snag in our release process, and the download URL wasn't registered in PyPI. I've fixed this, and you should be able to easy_install rbnotefield now. -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Jamie Gruener wrote: > If I try to install rbnotefield I get an error abo

Re: unable to easy_install rbnotefield from Beanbag, Inc.

Thanks for the quick response! Works as expected now. --Jamie On Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:36:11 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Jamie, > > It looks like we had a snag in our release process, and the download URL > wasn't registered in PyPI. I've fixed this, and you should be able to > ea

Re: Adding a new diff to existent review Loops on loading

Hi David, I attached the snapshot. On Friday, July 18, 2014 6:49:04 AM UTC+10, David Trowbridge wrote: > > Can you use the "Network" tab to find the contents of the response (the > one r

Re: Error when diff files on ReviewBoard site

Hi, Anyone can help me please? -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are sub

Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request

Hi david I observer another thing. When i remove the postreview.py file and use hello.txt as file and make changes.It is creating the diff but i can't view the diff in view diff button in reviewboard server. Is there any extension and file size restriction i am facing? i am attaching the log.

Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request

Also i am getting the below error in the reviewboard server while i try to view the diff from view diff button. Diff currently unavailable. *Error:* The patch to '/hello.txt' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.2r0DmL' for debugging purposes. `patch`

Re: Error when diff files on ReviewBoard site

A couple questions: - Can you check the contents of the "new 2.txt.diff" file and see if it's what you expect? - Can you check the contents of the "tmpeeeSkZ" file and see if it's what you expect? - What revision control system? - What version of GNU patch? -David On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:56

Re: Diff creation problem occuring while creating review request

Can you check the contents of the tmp file and the patch file and verify that they're what you expect? -David On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Shahadat Hossain wrote: > Also i am getting the below error in the reviewboard server while i try to > view the diff from view diff button. > > > Diff