Re: New Review Request Page is not Opening

My guess would be SELinux; if the directory you moved it to isn't on SELinux's list of "places the web server is allowed to read", that could be interfering. Or you could have forgotten to set the "httpd_can_network_memcached" Boolean. Try running "setenforce 0" as root and restating Apache. If it

Re: rb-site upgrade fails

Did you have any other ideas about this one? Thanks Rob On Tuesday, 31 May 2016 10:03:40 UTC+1, Rob Backhurst wrote: > > Ahaa, that looks better... > > >>> print reviewboard.__file__ > > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/__init__.pyc > > Thanks > Rob > > On

Re: Error linking hosting account on GitLab

-- Supercharge your Review Board with

Re: upgraded to reviewboard 1.7.28 (from 1.7.27)

I'm not sure what you mean. David is the one that says will work on it in the next point release. If you encountered the same issue in a different build/version maybe you should post the details of the issue here (or in a new thread) with snippet of the log. I moved to a different project for more

Re: RB, SVN, and AD

I did apt-get source python-svn then started trying to follow the directions in INSTALL.html, but they didn't work at all...although lookin gback now, some of that may have been because it was Friday afternoon and I missed something; I'm trying again now. On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 5:44:51 PM

Re: RB, SVN, and AD

OK, it definitely works better when you don't accidentally skip a step! I can now successfully do svn info from the command line, but I still can't create the repo in RB. The error message in the log is now: 2016-06-27 17:00:00,253 - ERROR - - SVN: Failed to get repository information for http

GCC needed to run ReviewBoard?

Hello, I'm trying to set up the latest ReviewBoard in a Docker container and I'm getting a error while it's installing the cryptography python module: Searching for cryptography>=1.1 Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/cryptography/ Best match: cryptography 1.4 Downloading https: //pypi.pytho

Re: GCC needed to run ReviewBoard?

Hi, Some of our dependencies themselves have dependencies that need compilation. In this case, my guess is the version of the module from the apt repository is just too old. Can you show the entire easy_install log? That'll help me see what package might be depending on this. In general, I'd sug

Re: RB, SVN, and AD

Hi Cathy, Progress is good! I think I'll need more info on your setup at this point though. Can you tell me more about how authentication works on your Subversion setup? From the client's end, is it a standard username/password, or is more involved? What does the server setup look like? The err

Re: upgraded to reviewboard 1.7.28 (from 1.7.27)

We shipped a fix in Review Board 1.7.29. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Jason Pernito wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean. David is the one that says w

Re: Error linking hosting account on GitLab

Hi, A couple things I want to check: 1) Is http://git.mycompany.com/ the root of your GitLab server, or does GitLab live in a subdirectory? 2) Is it using HTTP or HTTPS? Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board

Re: RB, SVN, and AD

The server is VisualSVN (paid edition), with Windows AD authentication. The server where RB is running is joined to the domain, and I can authenticate from the command line. Most users connect via TortoiseSVN on their Windows systems; I also have one other Ubuntu box configured so that i can j

Re: rb-site upgrade fails

Sorry Rob. This fell off my radar. A couple more tests from the Python shell: >>> import reviewboard.scmtools >>> print reviewboard.scmtools >>> import reviewboard.scmtools.core >>> print reviewboard.scmtools.core >>> from reviewboard.scmtools.core import PRE_CREATION, UNKNOWN, FileNotFoundError

Re: RB, SVN, and AD

Okay. So it's probably one of two things: 1) Something is still messed up somewhere with the recompilation. I don't know what, and can't really debug that from here. 2) The standard way of authenticating that we do doesn't support your setup. It could easily be #2. We must be able to authenticat

Re: New Review Request Page is not Opening

I'd still like to know what the browser's JavaScript console has to say, as this will be critical in diagnosing any issues. Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag Makers of Review Board On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:24 P

Re: RB, SVN, and AD

Since it is working on the command line at this point, my money would be on #2 rather than #1. http://serverfault.com/questions/183231/how-to-configure-review-board-running-under-linux-to-use-a-ldap-user is the most relevant-seeming info I've found so far, but enough has changed in the 5+ years