On 2013-02-16 02:43, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote:
Drifting even further off topic, have you ever given thought to using patience
diff in RB? (I've seen spots where it would have been an improvement... might
help with
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:13:02 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke
mwoehlk...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On 2013-02-15 15:29, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yes, this is correct in that this is how it's known to work. It's not
ideal,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Raja rajas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:13:02 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlk...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2013-02-15 15:29, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yes, this is correct in
Let's say I upload a patch that changes two files: foo.cpp and bar.cpp,
and publish it. Now let's say I upload a new version of the patch that
only changes bar.cpp.
When I ask RB to show the diff between the two request versions, I see
changes to foo.cpp as if I was looking at revision 1.
Yes, this is a known issue (filed as bug 1486).
Thanks,
-David
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Matthew Woehlke
mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's say I upload a patch that changes two files: foo.cpp and bar.cpp,
and publish it. Now let's say I upload a new version of the patch that only
Hi,
Yes, this is correct in that this is how it's known to work. It's not ideal,
though. There are many things with interdiffs that could be improved, some easy
to fix, some harder. This might not be so bad, if someone wanted to take it on.
(I won't be able to get to it any time soon.)
On 2013-02-15 15:29, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yes, this is correct in that this is how it's known to work. It's not ideal,
though. There are many things with interdiffs that could be improved, some easy to fix,
some harder. This might not be so bad, if someone wanted to take it on. (I won't be
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-02-15 15:29, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yes, this is correct in that this is how it's known to work. It's not
ideal, though. There are many things with interdiffs that could be improved,
some easy to fix,
