Comment #6 on issue 3785 by chip...@gmail.com: Publish changes fails
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3785
Yeah, 2.0.14 fixes it, though we recommend 2.0.15 for further improvements.
There's enough moving parts involved for the fixes that an upgrade, rather
than
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 3755 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbtools post command
ignores --update flag
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3755
Fixed in release-0.7.x (94301f5). This will ship in 0.7.4. Thanks!
--
You received this message because
Comment #10 on issue 3824 by trowb...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824
Are you stamping your commit messages with 'rbt stamp' before pushing?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: New
Comment #9 on issue 3843 by trowb...@gmail.com: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii'
codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 70: ordinal not in range(128)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3843
Jonathan, can you include the full traceback
Comment #11 on issue 3824 by kdari...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824
Yes I did here is the git log output
$ git log -2
commit a47d5832b1da763e9c9940a678eecd0357c767c2
Author: Pratap kdari...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Jun 3 09:52:16 2015
Comment #7 on issue 3843 by jonathan...@gmail.com:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 70:
ordinal not in range(128)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3843
I updated to 0.7.3 and am still seeing this problem. Same line (diff_data
Comment #8 on issue 3843 by jonathan...@gmail.com:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 70:
ordinal not in range(128)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3843
I also tried to workaround this by --excludeing the UTF-16 files, but then
I
Comment #5 on issue 3785 by gros...@gmail.com: Publish changes fails
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3785
I'm seeing this at VMware too; I cleared Chrome's cache but it only
provides a temporary reprieve from the issue. Do you have a version number
where
Comment #6 on issue 3824 by kdari...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824
Thanks, I have updated to 0.7.3 but now I get review_request_id as 0
all the time by default. Its not reading the commit message as defined in
the function
Comment #8 on issue 3093 by sorin.sb...@gmail.com: prevent adding a
duplicated repo name on reviewboard server
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3093
It seems that this problem wasn't really fixed as we can see it very often
on 2.0.15 - see
https
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 3753 by trowb...@gmail.com: CRITICAL: lambda()
keywords must be strings in RBTools 0.7.0
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3753
Fixed in rbtools release-0.7.x (0fc7be8). This will ship in 0.7.4. Thanks!
--
You received
Comment #9 on issue 3093 by trowb...@gmail.com: prevent adding a duplicated
repo name on reviewboard server
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3093
The fix only prevents getting in to this situation in the first place. If
you already have duplicate entries in your
Comment #7 on issue 3824 by trowb...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824
the git-hook-check-approval hook verifies that there's an existing review
request for the pushed change, which is listed in the commit message, and
that said
Comment #8 on issue 3824 by kdari...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824
Review request exist (used rbt post command to create it) and already
created but not sure why it is still taking the review_request_id as 0
--
You received
Updates:
Status: New
Labels: Component-SCMTools Component-RBTools
Comment #3 on issue 3832 by trowb...@gmail.com: Don't guess summary and
description when updating reviews with 'rbt post'
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3832
So unfortunately, due
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3840 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt post provides poor
diagnostics if connecting to a server with a certificate that cannot be
verified
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3840
Fixed in release-0.7.x (a6a7f8e
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: trowb...@gmail.com
Comment #4 on issue 3753 by trowb...@gmail.com: CRITICAL: lambda()
keywords must be strings in RBTools 0.7.0
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3753
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 3609 by trowb...@gmail.com: Error displaying diff,
wrapping index char traceback
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3609
This was fixed in 2.0.13
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 2980 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff viewer has problems
with control characters
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2980
Yes, this was fixed in 2.0.13
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: Incomplete
Comment #2 on issue 3851 by trowb...@gmail.com: Moved/renamed file
differences show the whole file being deleted and added as a new file ...
that's absurd
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3851
Closing due to a lack of answers
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Comment #4 on issue 3864 by chip...@gmail.com: rbt post
//depot/path/...@r1,@r2 throws an exception in 0.7.2 and no review
request gets created
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3864
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Comment #8 on issue 2696 by issamant...@gmail.com: Add comment missing
towards the end of a review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2696
This is a fantastic website and I can not recommend you guys enough. Full
of useful resource and great layout very easy on the eyes
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3878 by akshayta...@gmail.com: command rbt status/post are hanging
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3878
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug
Comment #24 on issue 3729 by pierre.k...@gmail.com: Cannot run rbt post in
RBTools 0.7.0
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3729
I have encountered the same issue with RBTools 0.7.2 on window 7 64 bit
when running the command rbt diff -d from command line.
Does anyone
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3862 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Loading Patch hangs due
to french local
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3862
Could you attach the patch file? We don't need the entire patch file, just
the part that includes
Comment #1 on issue 3877 by chip...@gmail.com: Ship it counts on the
dashboard include multiple ship its from one person
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3877
For now, this is intentional. Say I'm working with someone and have a Ship
It, but I realize I need to make
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3877 by buck.a...@gmail.com: Ship it counts on the dashboard
include multiple ship its from one person
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3877
What version are you running?
2.0.13. I've also reproduced
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 3863 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Web API should provide
an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received
Comment #4 on issue 3863 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Web API should provide
an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863
The fix for this issue has landed on release-2.5.x and master as commit
43d9bda
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement
Comment #1 on issue 3875 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Tree view on dashboard
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3875
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 3874 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Upload diff error 207,
but the file exists
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3874
The URL you indicated isn't one that Review Board uses. Did you mean:
api/review-requests
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3876 by step...@gallagherhome.com: rbt post + git-svn: CRITICAL:
object of type 'NoneType' has no len()
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3876
Copying this bug from EPEL Bugzilla. RHEL/CentOS 6 only
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Comment #1 on issue 3876 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: rbt post + git-svn:
CRITICAL: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3876
We're working on a patch that will be making its way into 0.7.3, which
Comment #3 on issue 3874 by chip...@gmail.com: Upload diff error 207, but
the file exists
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3874
Also, we'll need the full RBTools output with --debug.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #4 on issue 3874 by dnep...@yelp.com: Upload diff error 207, but
the file exists
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3874
Ah, I think I was looking at an old version of the API docs (1.5). I was
using the `rbt` tool, so I didn't curl the url myself.
I think
Comment #5 on issue 3874 by dnep...@yelp.com: Upload diff error 207, but
the file exists
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3874
Full debug output of `rbt`: http://pastebin.com/7eAG5SrB
The diff for that file looks something like this
http://pastebin.com/MDTQpvMY
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3875 by scherere...@gmail.com: Tree view on dashboard
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3875
What version are you running?
2.0.15
The idea would be to display a tree view based on the depends on field
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 3876 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: rbt post + git-svn:
CRITICAL: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3876
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Comment #2 on issue 3876 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: rbt post + git-svn:
CRITICAL: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3876
The fix for this issue has landed on the release-0.7.x and master branches
as commit
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3874 by dnep...@yelp.com: Upload diff error 207, but the file
exists
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3874
What version are you running?
2.0.12
What's the URL of the page containing the problem
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Comment #3 on issue 3863 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Web API should provide
an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received
Comment #23 on issue 3729 by jyx140...@gmail.com: Cannot run rbt post in
RBTools 0.7.0
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3729
$ rbt post -g --debug
RBTools 0.7.2
Python 2.7.6 (default, Nov 10 2013, 19:24:18) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)]
Running on Windows-7-6.1.7601
Comment #22 on issue 3729 by jyx140...@gmail.com: Cannot run rbt post in
RBTools 0.7.0
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3729
RBTools 0.7.2
Python 2.7.6 (default, Nov 10 2013, 19:24:18) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)]
Running on Windows-7-6.1.7601-SP1
Home = C:\Users
Comment #5 on issue 3824 by trowb...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824
This bug fix will ship in 0.7.3
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust
Comment #4 on issue 3824 by kdari...@gmail.com: Git hooks not working
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3824
I am facing the same issue RBT version is as below
$ rbt --version
RBTools 0.7.2 (RBTools-0.7.2-1.el6.noarch)
Upgraded rbtools as well but no luck ..
$ git push
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3873 by stbo...@gmail.com: New Review Request for Committed
Change does not work for branch names containing whitespace
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3873
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3865 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt post fails when random
repository is misconfigured in reviewboard
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3865
Fixed in release-0.7.x (e38048f). This will ship in 0.7.3. Thanks!
--
You received
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 3743 by trowb...@gmail.com: rb-site manage
get-siteconfig and set-siteconfig don't correctly handle int, bool or null
values
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3743
Fixed in djblets release-0.8.x (9e1e462
Comment #5 on issue 3841 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbtools.api.request
hardcodes http return codes
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3841
Issue 3597 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3603 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools ~/.reviewboardrc
overrides project settings
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3603
This has been fixed in the latest rbtools code. In 0.7.2 it's improved, and
0.7.3 will fix
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 3841
Comment #2 on issue 3597 by trowb...@gmail.com: Interdiff shows incorrect
file status; cannot handle deleted files
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3597
I believe that this is a duplicate of 3481 (which
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 3836 by trowb...@gmail.com: Full index after upgrade to
2.0.15 fails with: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: App with
label djblets is missing a models.py module
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3836
Fixed
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: Component-Reviews
Comment #1 on issue 3821 by trowb...@gmail.com: Allows disabling markdown
globally
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3821
There's no UI for this because it's not yet been requested enough to
justify
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3871 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt post hangs when in a
post-commit hook
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3871
Fixed in release-0.7.x (984f5e6). This will ship in 0.7.3. Thanks!
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 3804 by trowb...@gmail.com: Error editing description
with markup due to unicode characters
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3804
Fixed in release-2.0.x (354070b). This will ship in 2.0.16. Thanks!
--
You received
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3864 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt post
//depot/path/...@r1,@r2 throws an exception in 0.7.2 and no review
request gets created
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3864
Fixed in release-0.7.x (1a61c2a). This will ship
Comment #1 on issue 3830 by msu...@aurea.com: Rebuild index fails due to
character encoding
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3830
Might same as bug #3869
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3852 by trowb...@gmail.com: Allow reviewers to remove
themselves from CC for a review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3852
We've recently added archive and mute features to git (to be released
in 2.5). When muting
Comment #2 on issue 3852 by vlov...@gmail.com: Allow reviewers to remove
themselves from CC for a review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3852
Sweet. Will the review owner be able to see who has it muted/archived? I
could imagine wanting to know that so that I know
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3688 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt has issues updating
diff with local repository path
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3688
Are you able to try with a more modern rbtools?
This also looks pretty similar
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 2761 by trowb...@gmail.com: Publish review without
triggering an email update
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2761
Fixed in release-2.5.x (051b134). This will ship in 2.5
--
You received this message because
Comment #3 on issue 3852 by trowb...@gmail.com: Allow reviewers to remove
themselves from CC for a review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3852
Right now no, but there's also no way to know who's just willfully ignoring
it. We'll possibly consider adding
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3230 by trowb...@gmail.com: Editting Columns on Reviews
Table
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3230
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: trowb...@gmail.com
Labels: Component-RBTools
Comment #1 on issue 3865 by trowb...@gmail.com: rbt post fails when random
repository is misconfigured in reviewboard
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3865
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3871 by pafffk...@gmail.com: rbt post hangs when in a post-commit
hook
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3871
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3870 by pafffk...@gmail.com: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec
can't decode byte 0xd0 in position 1: ordinal not in range(128)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3870
What version are you running
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3872 by javiersa...@gmail.com: Can't create local git repo on
Windows
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3872
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your
Updates:
Status: ThirdParty
Comment #1 on issue 3868 by trowb...@gmail.com: Unable publish code review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3868
You'll need to follow up with the people that run the server at Amazon.
This bug tracker is for the upstream project
Updates:
Status: ThirdParty
Comment #1 on issue 3872 by trowb...@gmail.com: Can't create local git repo
on Windows
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3872
According to
https://community.bitnami.com/t/environment-can-only-contain-strings/24300/12
it should work
Updates:
Status: ThirdParty
Comment #5 on issue 3867 by trowb...@gmail.com: importerror with http_client
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3867
I don't really know what to say--obviously, six.moves.http_client is
supposed to exist. Something is weird with your
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3868 by nanosoft...@gmail.com: Unable publish code review
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3868
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report
Comment #2 on issue 3867 by kevin.michael.lloyd: importerror with
http_client
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3867
COTNPL-0P8G3QN:tomcat mikelloyd$ pip freeze | grep six
six==1.9.0
I read https://github.com/kevin1024/vcrpy/issues/131 about this issue, but
I'm not sure
Comment #5 on issue 3843 by pafffk...@gmail.com:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 70:
ordinal not in range(128)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3843
Hello, I have the same problem, not from git.py but from svn.py:
Running: svn
Comment #6 on issue 3843 by pafffk...@gmail.com:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 70:
ordinal not in range(128)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3843
Hello, I have the same problem, not from git.py but from svn.py:
Running: svn
Comment #4 on issue 3867 by kevin.michael.lloyd: importerror with
http_client
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3867
Uninstalled rbt after some failures, reinstalled. Ran into original issue.
Reverted six to 1.6.0, now rbt is throwing the same errors.
--
You received
Comment #3 on issue 3867 by kevin.michael.lloyd: importerror with
http_client
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3867
Reverting to six 1.6.0 resolved the issue for me. It looks to be an issue
with Python six, not rbt.
--
You received this message because this project
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3869 by msu...@aurea.com: User can not log in due to characters
in name
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3869
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 3843 by trowb...@gmail.com: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii'
codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 70: ordinal not in range(128)
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3843
Fixed in release-0.7.x (219abf7). This will ship
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #3 on issue 3814 by trowb...@gmail.com: AttributeError: 'Namespace'
object has no attribute 'revision_range'
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3814
Fixed in release-0.7.x (0cb53be). This will ship in 0.7.3
--
You received
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 3867 by trowb...@gmail.com: importerror with http_client
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3867
What version of six is installed?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3867 by kevin.michael.lloyd: importerror with http_client
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3867
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3866 by kamaldee...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches fail to
get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety
Comment #8 on issue 3866 by chip...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
It's a bit more complex than that. We don't just shell out to diff. Rather,
we use that as a base, and generate a more thorough diff
Comment #11 on issue 1395 by rohithra...@gmail.com: Exporting review
comments
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1395
It's been 5+ years now. using Reviewboard.
Thanks a lot to the developers.
Unfortunately, there was no response to: liannela...@gmail.com's question.
I
Comment #10 on issue 1395 by namrata@gmail.com: Exporting review
comments
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1395
We need this feature too. It will be really useful extension.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: trowb...@gmail.com
Labels: Component-RBTools
Comment #2 on issue 3814 by trowb...@gmail.com: AttributeError: 'Namespace'
object has no attribute 'revision_range'
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3814
Comment #2 on issue 3866 by kamaldee...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
This code is protected under license, but I can share the initial few lines
if it helps. If not, I can just create a new mxml
Comment #4 on issue 3866 by kamaldee...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
Nope, fails.
$ patch -p2 ZoroDebugPlayer.mxml ~/zdp.diff
patching file ZoroDebugPlayer.mxml
patch: malformed patch at line 5
Comment #2 on issue 3863 by csipak.a...@ardinsys.eu: Web API should provide
an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863
Thanks for the tip, but that would still mean a big payload and a lot of
processing
Comment #7 on issue 3866 by kamaldee...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
I am using a post-review script built on top of RBTools. I looked in the
source and the way diff is done is using the unix diff
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3858 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: rbt post --username does
not always authenticate properly
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3858
The fix for this issue has landed on the release-0.7.x and master branches
as commit
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3857 by trowb...@gmail.com: Problem with displaying
java diffs of maven projects in clearcase
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3857
Is there a reason why you discarded the above-mentioned review request?
--
You
Comment #6 on issue 3866 by trowb...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
You created your diff via `p4 diff`? Could you try with `rbt diff`?
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 3866 by trowb...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
It would be very helpful to see the patch file in question, not just the
source file.
--
You received
Comment #3 on issue 3866 by trowb...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
Hrmph, ok. I really don't know why `patch` would say that it's malformed.
If you try applying that patch manually (by executing the patch
Comment #5 on issue 3866 by kamaldee...@gmail.com: mxml source file patches
fail to get applied
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3866
The generated diff file does not look correct. I use perforce. The edited
lines are not in the patch at all.
Maybe this is a p4 diff
Comment #43 on issue 489 by csipak.a...@ardinsys.eu: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT
button
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489
@pvgodd: looks like this issue got forgotten.
Last time it was touched by a project member, it was bound to the 1.8
milestone (after it was repeatedly
Comment #44 on issue 489 by trowb...@gmail.com: [ ] DON'T SHIP IT button
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=489
It's not forgotten, just that this is a relatively tricky thing (literally
everyone has an opinion about how ship-its should be improved/changed and
whatever
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3863 by csipak.a...@ardinsys.eu: Web API should provide an id
field for a review request's every depends_on entry
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863
What version are you running?
2.0.15
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3865 by jonathan...@gmail.com: rbt post fails when random
repository is misconfigured in reviewboard
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3865
What version are you running?
rbtools 0.7.2
reviewboard 2.0.6
301 - 400 of 8899 matches
Mail list logo