On Aug. 21, 2015, 6:35 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
include/mesos/mesos.proto, lines 917-920
https://reviews.apache.org/r/36321/diff/9/?file=1038857#file1038857line917
I think the name `Unavailability` is too specific to maintenance, how
about something more generic, like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37508/
---
(Updated Aug. 23, 2015, 12:26 p.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37505/
---
(Updated Aug. 23, 2015, 8:58 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37505/
---
(Updated Aug. 23, 2015, 8:59 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37505/
---
(Updated Aug. 23, 2015, 9:44 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/37508/
---
(Updated Aug. 23, 2015, 12:33 p.m.)
Review request for mesos.
Bugs:
On Aug. 9, 2015, 11:28 p.m., Mesos ReviewBot wrote:
Bad patch!
Reviews applied: [37266]
Failed command: ./support/apply-review.sh -n -r 37266
Error:
2015-08-09 23:28:17 URL:https://reviews.apache.org/r/37266/diff/raw/
[8119/8119] - 37266.patch [1]
Traceback (most recent
