> On May 19, 2015, 2:02 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > This might be a valid namespace alias use case that we hadn't considered,
> > because there is no way to be able to write just `http::Response`
> > otherwise, is there?
> >
> > Seems quite verbose to write process::http everywhere, and on the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/#review87851
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [34375]
All tests passed.
- M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/
---
(Updated June 13, 2015, 9:51 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Till Toenshoff.
> On May 19, 2015, 2:02 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> > This might be a valid namespace alias use case that we hadn't considered,
> > because there is no way to be able to write just `http::Response`
> > otherwise, is there?
> >
> > Seems quite verbose to write process::http everywhere, and on the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/#review84497
---
Ship it!
I admit I don't like namespace aliases which have the scop
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/#review84251
---
This might be a valid namespace alias use case that we hadn't consid
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/#review84247
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [34375]
All tests passed.
- M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/#review84238
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Till Toenshoff
On May 18, 2015, 11:13 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34375/
---
Review request for mesos.
Repository: mesos
Description
---
See summary.
