Re: Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35033/#review88822 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [35033] All tests passed. - M

Re: Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35033/ --- (Updated June 22, 2015, 9:51 a.m.) Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod K

Re: Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

> On June 8, 2015, 2:18 p.m., Till Toenshoff wrote: > > src/linux/fs.hpp, line 34 > > > > > > I guess you copied the below for version of sys/mount.h > > > > Would it make sense to exactly state which distro/ve

Re: Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35033/#review87030 --- Ship it! src/linux/fs.hpp

Re: Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35033/#review86528 --- Patch looks great! Reviews applied: [35033] All tests passed. - M

Re: Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35033/#review86498 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jie Yu On June 3, 2015, 10:53 p.m., Ian Down

Re: Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35033/ --- (Updated June 3, 2015, 3:53 p.m.) Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod Ko

Review Request 35033: Define potentially missing MS_* mount flags.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35033/ --- Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Vinod Kone. Repository: mesos Descriptio