Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1294#issuecomment-47989149
Can you paste the error messages thrown by this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-47987610
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16316/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-47987609
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-47987148
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14538915
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -15,393 +15,194 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+import scala.util.Properties
+impor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-47987156
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-47986687
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user concretevitamin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#discussion_r14538726
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ import org.apache.spark.sq
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1238#issuecomment-47986699
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1294#issuecomment-47984822
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16314/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1294#issuecomment-47984820
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1025#issuecomment-47984396
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1025#issuecomment-47984385
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14537682
--- Diff: bin/run-example ---
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ else
fi
if [ -f "$FWDIR/RELEASE" ]; then
- export SPARK_EXAMPLES_JAR=`ls "$FWDIR"/lib/spar
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14537586
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -15,393 +15,194 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+import scala.util.Properties
+impor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1294#issuecomment-47983823
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1050#issuecomment-47983864
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1294#issuecomment-47983810
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14537335
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -15,393 +15,194 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+import scala.util.Properties
+impor
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1265#issuecomment-47983619
PR #1294 should fix this problem, after merger #1294, this one can also be
merged safely.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
GitHub user liancheng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1294
Don't throw TreeNodeException in `execution.ExplainCommand`
This is a fix for the problem revealed by PR #1265.
Currently `HiveComparisonSuite` ignores output of `ExplainCommand` since
Ca
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14537279
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -15,393 +15,194 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+import scala.util.Properties
+impor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1025#issuecomment-47983319
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1025#issuecomment-47983304
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14537201
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -15,393 +15,194 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+import scala.util.Properties
+impor
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47982767
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47982776
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14536966
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -15,393 +15,194 @@
* limitations under the License.
*/
+import scala.util.Properties
+impor
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#discussion_r14536931
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -434,250 +235,41 @@ object SparkBuild extends Build {
"-noqualifier", "java.lang"
)
)
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47982406
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-47981340
@ScrapCodes thanks for updating this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-47981128
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/772#issuecomment-47981107
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1265#issuecomment-47981028
`HiveComparisonTest` simply ignores all `ExplainCommand` and don't check
their output. We should catch the exception in `execution.ExplainCommand` and
report the except
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1283#issuecomment-47980908
Thanks, I merged this into master and 1.0!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1283
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47978602
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16310/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1283#issuecomment-47978600
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16308/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1179#issuecomment-47978596
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1179#issuecomment-47978599
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16309/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1283#issuecomment-47978597
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47978598
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1273#discussion_r14533232
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/HadoopRDD.scala ---
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ class HadoopRDD[K, V](
// local process. The local cache
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1272#issuecomment-47970749
@rxin wins because he says that SQLConf will become a Thread-local
variable. This looks good, the only thing to change for thread-safety is to add
a synchronized for get
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-47970667
Merged. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171#issuecomment-47970639
Merged. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1171
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/643#issuecomment-47969925
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16307/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/643#issuecomment-47969923
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1179#issuecomment-47968906
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1179#issuecomment-47968891
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47968895
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47968908
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1099#issuecomment-47968583
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1283#issuecomment-47967682
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1283#issuecomment-47967655
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1283#issuecomment-47966853
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1151#discussion_r14529947
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -371,6 +371,19 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest {
(3,
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1151#discussion_r14529948
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkStrategies.scala ---
@@ -296,3 +298,5 @@ private[sql] abstract class SparkStrategies ex
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1151#discussion_r14529904
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SqlParser.scala ---
@@ -135,13 +137,12 @@ class SqlParser extends StandardTokenParsers w
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47965718
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47965725
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16305/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user vrilleup commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-47964502
@yangliuyu did you persist the underlying RDD[Vector] behind RowMatrix?
This RDD is used in every iteration, caching will improve run time a lot. From
my tests, if the R
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/643#issuecomment-47963771
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/643#issuecomment-47963757
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user vrilleup commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-47963684
@mengxr the plan sounds good, I will make the changes. I had some
experiences on designing a generic ParameterSet, including constraints on
individual parameter, constrai
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-47962624
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-47962626
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16306/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-47962409
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-47962391
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-47962057
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-47962042
@bgreeven Please add `[MLLIB]` to your PR, following
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark . It
makes easier for people who want to searc
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47961794
@kellrott Please create a JIRA and then add both the JIRA number and
`[MLLIB]` to the title of this PR, following
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contrib
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1293#issuecomment-47961640
The problem lies in `initKMeansParallel`, the implementation of k-means||
algorithm. Since it selects at most the centers as many as the data number,
when calling `LocalKM
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1289#issuecomment-47959923
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1288#issuecomment-47959809
This fixes [SPARK-2349](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2349).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1288
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1288#issuecomment-47959481
LGTM, merging into master and branch-1.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1293#issuecomment-47959115
data.count() is actually a very expensive operation, as it has to scan all
the data. If cached, it may not be as much a problem, but it is still probably
not worth it fo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1293#issuecomment-47958358
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1274
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1274#issuecomment-47958114
LGTM. Merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1293
[SPARK-2355] Add checker for the number of clusters
When the number of clusters given to perform with
org.apache.spark.mllib.clustering.KMeans under parallel initial mode is greater
than data number
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1289#issuecomment-47957745
This should be merged into branch-1.0 and branch-0.9 as well, as this bug
disallows queuing up standalone drivers.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47951045
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47951037
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47948720
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47948723
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16304/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47948510
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47948524
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47947236
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16303/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47947235
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47947062
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292#issuecomment-47947046
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user kellrott opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1292
Mllib grouped optimization
The purpose of this patch is the enable MLLib to better handle scenarios
where the user would want to do learning on multiple feature/label sets at the
same time. Rather
Github user scwf closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/645
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
Github user yangliuyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/964#issuecomment-47886598
@mengxr k is 100, rCond, tol and maxIterations are all defaults, i.e. 1e-9,
1e-10, 300. Change iteration number from 300 to 200 will not reduce too much
time cost <10% (
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#issuecomment-47886626
@avulanov Thanks for adding metrics for multiclass classification! I made
one pass. Besides the inline comments, how can we handle models that output raw
scores for each c
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#discussion_r14505016
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1155#discussion_r14505019
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/evaluation/MulticlassMetricsSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
201 - 300 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
