Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#discussion_r16338266
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/SampledRDDs.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user nrchandan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1787#discussion_r16338275
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/DoubleRDDFunctions.scala
---
@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ class DoubleRDDFunctions(self: RDD[Double]) extends
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#issuecomment-52455091
@jkbradley I tested the examples and found that `tree.py` is not included
in `run-tests.py`. If we include it, it will throw errors due to
`trainClassifier` needs at
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1932#issuecomment-52456438
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.1. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2003#issuecomment-52456513
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.1. Thanks for working on the
documentation!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user bgreeven commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-52456503
Thanks for your feedback. I'll write some documentation, and also add some
comments. I'll try with similar size data.
The internal data structure of the weights
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16338954
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -159,6 +159,28 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16338944
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkHadoopWriter.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,33 @@ private[hive] class SparkHiveHadoopWriter(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#issuecomment-52456910
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18738/consoleFull)
for PR 1878 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16338953
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -159,6 +159,28 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
GitHub user Ishiihara opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2010
[MLlib] Remove transform(dataset: RDD[String]) from Word2Vec public API
@mengxr
Remove transform(dataset: RDD[String]) from public API.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16338992
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -178,6 +200,12 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16339033
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -204,12 +235,81 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16339036
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -204,12 +235,81 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16339176
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -204,12 +235,81 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16339200
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -204,12 +235,81 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user mubarak commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1723#discussion_r16339260
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -813,7 +816,10 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
* A regular
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1963#issuecomment-52457958
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18739/consoleFull)
for PR 1963 at commit
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2010#issuecomment-52458146
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2010#issuecomment-52458413
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18744/consoleFull)
for PR 2010 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16339566
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -231,14 +327,26 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16339580
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -231,14 +327,26 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2003#issuecomment-52458933
**Tests timed out** after a configured wait of `120m`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#issuecomment-52459171
@yhuai It would be nice if you can have a look at this PR as you're the
expert here :)
@baishuo You can refer to `sql/README.md` for details about setting up
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16340005
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkHadoopWriter.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,33 @@ private[hive] class SparkHiveHadoopWriter(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16340258
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkHadoopWriter.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,33 @@ private[hive] class SparkHiveHadoopWriter(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16340321
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -159,6 +162,36 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16340359
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,15 +270,78 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16340415
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -159,6 +162,36 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16340505
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -159,6 +162,36 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2010#issuecomment-52462145
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18744/consoleFull)
for PR 2010 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2010
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user Ishiihara closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1871
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1787#issuecomment-52463719
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18745/consoleFull)
for PR 1787 at commit
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2011
remove MaxPermSize option for jvm 1.8
In JVM 1.8.0, MaxPermSize is no longer supported.
In spark `stderr` output, there would be a line of
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2011#issuecomment-52467109
@aarondav I have modified codes according to your comments, and since I did
a rebase, I have to start a new PR...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2011#issuecomment-52467263
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18746/consoleFull)
for PR 2011 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343293
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -191,7 +257,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1787#issuecomment-52468388
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18745/consoleFull)
for PR 1787 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343341
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343351
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343370
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343382
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343397
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343411
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343705
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16343814
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16344256
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -191,7 +257,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2011#issuecomment-52472156
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18746/consoleFull)
for PR 2011 at commit
Github user chutium commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1855#discussion_r16345194
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/ParquetTypes.scala ---
@@ -403,7 +406,10 @@ private[parquet] object ParquetTypesConverter
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16345316
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -159,6 +162,36 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16345513
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -191,7 +257,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
GitHub user hzw19900416 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2012
Move a bracket in validateSettings of SparkConf
Move a bracket in validateSettings of SparkConf
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2012#issuecomment-52474725
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16346630
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -191,7 +257,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16346660
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -191,7 +257,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16347194
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -191,7 +257,10 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2013
Delete unused Travis CI config
Per @rxin at
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1987#issuecomment-52405072 , Travis CI
config is not used and can be deleted. I didn't see anyone had picked that
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2013#issuecomment-52485853
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18747/consoleFull)
for PR 2013 at commit
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2014
SPARK-3069 [DOCS] Build instructions in README are outdated
Here's my crack at Bertrand's suggestion. The Github `README.md` contains
build info that's outdated. It should just point to the current
Github user akopich commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#discussion_r16351508
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/clustering/topicmodeling/utils/serialization/TObjectIntHashMapSerializer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
Github user guowei2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1822#issuecomment-52489381
i'm very sorry. i just rebase my brach to spark/master. what should i do to
fix this .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16351653
--- Diff: sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkHadoopWriter.scala
---
@@ -93,6 +93,33 @@ private[hive] class SparkHiveHadoopWriter(
null)
Github user guowei2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1822#issuecomment-52490972
may i close this PR and create a new PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2013#issuecomment-52491425
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18747/consoleFull)
for PR 2013 at commit
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1822#issuecomment-52491562
Try this: `git commit -m Big-ass commit --allow-empty` `git rebase -i
master`, `git push origin sql-memory-patch -f `
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2002#discussion_r16353011
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -451,10 +451,56 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
*
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52493510
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18749/consoleFull)
for PR 1269 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1031#issuecomment-52495578
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18750/consoleFull)
for PR 1031 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52500225
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18749/consoleFull)
for PR 1269 at commit
Github user akopich commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52500502
@mengxr
I have tried my best to make interfaces minimal and comment them in
understandable way.
Please, could you mention what exactly is unclear?
---
If your
Github user akopich commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52499944
@chazchandler,
As far as I can see, you run RobustPLSA. Behavious like this may take place
if every word from a document is explained by background or noise.
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#discussion_r16358186
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/InsertIntoHiveTable.scala
---
@@ -201,17 +270,79 @@ case class InsertIntoHiveTable(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1031#issuecomment-52503551
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18750/consoleFull)
for PR 1031 at commit
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2015
[mllib] DecisionTree: treeAggregate + Python example bug fix
Small DecisionTree updates:
* Changed main DecisionTree aggregate to treeAggregate.
* Fixed bug in python example
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52507178
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18753/consoleFull)
for PR 1269 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52509222
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18751/consoleFull)
for PR 1269 at commit
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1919#issuecomment-52509183
@baishuo Thank you for working on it.
I have three general comments.
1. Hive has a lots of confs that are used to influence how semantic
analyzer works.
GitHub user sarutak opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2016
[SPARK-3101] Flag variable in ApplicationMaster should be declared as
volatile
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sarutak/spark
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2016#issuecomment-52510886
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18754/consoleFull)
for PR 2016 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1878#issuecomment-52512515
@mengxr Thanks! I'll send the tree fixes in the other PR I sent just now
on treeAggregate(), and I will do the keyCount fix in this PR.
---
If your project is set up
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2015#issuecomment-52513939
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18755/consoleFull)
for PR 2015 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52515294
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18753/consoleFull)
for PR 1269 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2015#issuecomment-52513395
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chazchandler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1269#issuecomment-52515801
Is there a straightforward way to get the `topics` themselves back out of
the `infer` step? They seem to be [effectively private inside of
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2002#discussion_r16363882
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -451,10 +451,56 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
*
Github user erikerlandson commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1964#issuecomment-52516267
I'm wondering if it might be simpler and more idiomatic to just define
distance measure directly as any subclass of Function2, like:
trait DistanceMeasure
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2002#discussion_r16364099
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -451,10 +451,56 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
*
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2008#issuecomment-52518124
Thanks for the patch, based on the brief discussion
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2016#issuecomment-52519179
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18754/consoleFull)
for PR 2016 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2002#discussion_r16365281
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -451,10 +451,56 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
*
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2002#discussion_r16365389
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -451,10 +451,56 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
*
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1813#issuecomment-52520416
So, any more feedback on this patch? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1252#issuecomment-52520495
Hi, could we get this merged if there's no more feedback? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1724#issuecomment-52520456
Ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1787#issuecomment-52520863
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.1. Thanks!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2015#discussion_r16366057
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/mllib/decision_tree_runner.py ---
@@ -124,7 +124,9 @@ def usage():
(reindexedData, origToNewLabels) =
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1787
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1724#issuecomment-52521078
@vanzin I'm going to quickly test this on a yarn cluster first, and then
I'll merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2015#issuecomment-52521130
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
