Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65857520
[Test build #24193 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24193/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-65858141
[Test build #24194 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24194/consoleFull)
for PR 3409 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3623#issuecomment-65858470
[Test build #24190 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24190/consoleFull)
for PR 3623 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3623#issuecomment-65858480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3620#issuecomment-65859058
Merging in master branch-1.2. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user alanctgardner opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3626
[MLLIB] SPARK-4362: Added classProbabilities method for Naive Bayes
Added methods which accept an RDD or array and return a map of (label -
posterior prob.) for each input set rather than
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3626#discussion_r21402613
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,24 @@ class NaiveBayesModel private[mllib] (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3626#issuecomment-65859729
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3626#discussion_r21402733
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,24 @@ class NaiveBayesModel private[mllib] (
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3626#discussion_r21402810
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,24 @@ class NaiveBayesModel private[mllib] (
Github user alanctgardner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3626#discussion_r21402907
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,24 @@ class NaiveBayesModel private[mllib] (
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3626#discussion_r21403159
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/NaiveBayes.scala ---
@@ -65,6 +65,24 @@ class NaiveBayesModel private[mllib] (
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65861501
[Test build #24195 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24195/consoleFull)
for PR 3570 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3553#issuecomment-65862084
I would use `[SPARK-4691][Minor] Rewrite a few lines in shuffle code`. Not
a big deal if you don't change this. I'll merge this once we cut the new 1.2
release.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3622#issuecomment-65862705
[Test build #24191 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24191/consoleFull)
for PR 3622 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3622#issuecomment-65862711
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-65862808
[Test build #24196 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24196/consoleFull)
for PR 3409 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3553#issuecomment-65862751
Should probably just merge it into master, and thus it's independent of the
1.2 release, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3624#issuecomment-65864826
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3624#issuecomment-65864818
[Test build #24192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24192/consoleFull)
for PR 3624 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65865836
[Test build #24193 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24193/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65865847
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#discussion_r21406023
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClientFactory.java
---
@@ -56,12 +57,28 @@
* TransportClient, all
Github user evanv commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2872#issuecomment-65867098
Is VPC support slated for the next maintenance release? Support for VPCs is
definitely needed for a lot of us, and it'd be great if we didn't have to patch
it ourselves.
GitHub user andrewor14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627
[SPARK-4771][Docs] Document standalone cluster supervise mode
@tdas looks like streaming already refers to the supervise mode. The link
from there is broken though.
You can merge this pull
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#discussion_r21406531
--- Diff: docs/spark-standalone.md ---
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ To run an interactive Spark shell against the cluster,
run the following command
You
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#discussion_r21406649
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClientFactory.java
---
@@ -97,23 +116,45 @@ public TransportClient
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#issuecomment-65867988
[Test build #24197 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24197/consoleFull)
for PR 3627 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#discussion_r21406760
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClientFactory.java
---
@@ -97,23 +116,45 @@ public TransportClient
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#discussion_r21406852
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClientFactory.java
---
@@ -143,43 +184,41 @@ public void
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#discussion_r21406868
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClientFactory.java
---
@@ -143,43 +184,41 @@ public void
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65869095
[Test build #24198 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24198/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65869325
Looks mostly good to me, a few remaining synchronization issues. Will take
another long look after you address all comments. I'd really appreciate a test,
though, if we
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-65870516
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-65870513
[Test build #24194 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24194/consoleFull)
for PR 3409 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65870763
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65870758
[Test build #24195 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24195/consoleFull)
for PR 3570 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-65871549
[Test build #24196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24196/consoleFull)
for PR 3409 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3409#issuecomment-65871555
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65873447
The MiMa failure is surprising, since that class was marked as `private`
and therefore shouldn't have been subject to compatibility checks.
@ScrapCodes, do you know
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65874329
[Test build #24199 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24199/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65874403
[Test build #24198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24198/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65874408
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#issuecomment-65874932
[Test build #24197 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24197/consoleFull)
for PR 3627 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3627#issuecomment-65874938
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65875429
[Test build #24200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24200/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user ash211 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3130#issuecomment-65878128
I think a core disconnect here is that the Spark team thought the majority
use of Spark in applications would be through the spark-submit script. But
Matt and I (and
Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3130#issuecomment-65878359
Totally makes sense. I don't think I have enough context in the Spark world
as a whole to suggest a holistic build design, but I agree that this is where
the disconnect
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3130#issuecomment-65878693
I am also in the camp that wants to use Spark without `spark-submit`. My
broad experience is that it's quite possible to programmatically configure
`SparkContext`
GitHub user ksakellis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628
[SPARK-4774] Makes HiveFromSpark more portable
HiveFromSpark read the kv1.txt file from
SPARK_HOME/examples/src/main/resources/kv1.txt which assumed
you had a source tree checked out. Now we
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65879463
[Test build #24201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24201/consoleFull)
for PR 3628 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65879460
Looks ok aside from the cleanup issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#discussion_r21412176
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/HiveFromSpark.scala
---
@@ -24,10 +28,16 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveContext
Github user avulanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1379#issuecomment-65879536
@dbtsai Here are the results of my tests:
- Settings:
- Spark: latest Spark merged with
https://github.com/dbtsai/spark/tree/dbtsai-mlor (manual merge) and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65879741
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65879737
[Test build #24199 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24199/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65880042
Thanks for doing this! Mind adding `[SQL]` to the PR title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65880366
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65880355
[Test build #24200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24200/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user avulanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1290#issuecomment-65880449
@jkbradley @manishamde I did performance comparisons with multinomial
regression and posted them here:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1379#issuecomment-65879536.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65880549
[Test build #24202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24202/consoleFull)
for PR 3628 at commit
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2631#issuecomment-65880798
@ankurdave
I have removed the Spark core related to modify
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3564#issuecomment-65881199
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3564#issuecomment-65881246
[Test build #24203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24203/consoleFull)
for PR 3564 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3564#issuecomment-65881901
[Test build #24203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24203/consoleFull)
for PR 3564 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3564#issuecomment-65881904
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user nchammas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3564#issuecomment-65882473
Hmm, this error from the latest test is interesting:
```
[info] - Read with RegexSerDe *** FAILED *** (2 seconds, 339 milliseconds)
[info] Failed to
Github user guowei2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3617#issuecomment-65882460
Sorry for that.
i have a mistake about not test with shim12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2631#issuecomment-65882576
Great, thanks! LGTM - I'll merge this after Jenkins runs.
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65882564
[Test build #24201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24201/consoleFull)
for PR 3628 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65882567
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3617#issuecomment-65883022
[Test build #24204 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24204/consoleFull)
for PR 3617 at commit
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#discussion_r21413717
--- Diff:
network/common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClientFactory.java
---
@@ -143,43 +190,41 @@ public void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65883209
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3628#issuecomment-65883207
[Test build #24202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24202/consoleFull)
for PR 3628 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65883623
[Test build #24206 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24206/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user nkronenfeld commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65883687
Should I back out the correction to the mima failure?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65883736
No, I'd leave it. I just thought I'd mention it so that we eventually
investigate. I'll finish reviewing this PR later this weekend.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014
Github user nkronenfeld commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65883762
great... I think outside the mima issue, it should be all set, unless I can
figure out a way to unit test it. So far, my best methods of testing it
involve
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65883784
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user nkronenfeld commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3570#issuecomment-65883848
oh, a note for when you're reviewing - I didn't move the clear call, I just
added a second one; I saw no particular harm in leaving the old one there too,
just in
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65884482
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3617#issuecomment-65884641
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3617#issuecomment-65884637
[Test build #24204 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24204/consoleFull)
for PR 3617 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65885045
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65885123
[Test build #24207 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24207/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65885553
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65885551
[Test build #24206 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24206/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65886767
[Test build #24207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24207/consoleFull)
for PR 3625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3625#issuecomment-65886768
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2631#issuecomment-65887724
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user ankurdave commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2631#issuecomment-65888121
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2631#issuecomment-65888268
[Test build #24208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24208/consoleFull)
for PR 2631 at commit
101 - 194 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
